We won. Winning is good.

My latest campaign job is now over, having ended on July thirtieth.  It was a hard fought campaign, unpleasant at times (not on our side) but we prevailed.

Cindy Chavez is now the Supervisor for the Second District of Santa Clara County.

She won in spite of having not one but two local papers against her — one of them quite vituperatively so.  She won in spite of having an opponent who was willing to run a campaign tying her to the disgraced former Supervisor.  She won in spite of having the Chamber of Commerce and the Republican Party — and their assets — entering the fray supporting the other side.

She won by running, as Mercury News columnist Scott Herhold pointed out, the most disciplined campaign the county has seen in a decade.  She won by working her tail off.  She won by having a group of campaign workers and volunteers who were very good at what they do.  She won by taking care of her people: it is amazing what it does for morale when the candidate comes by to answer questions and give encouragement.

I would work on any campaign for office this woman runs for.  Ever.  She was a driving force behind Measure D last fall, the measure that raised the minimum wage in San Jose to ten dollars an hour.  She works for programs that benefit people.

In short, she cares.

At the election party on Tuesday, when I approached to have my picture taken with her, she hugged me and thanked me for my hard work — and, without me having to introduce myself, called me by name.  She cared enough about the minions, us grunts who manned the phones and walked the streets, to know who we were.  On Wednesday, I got a card from her thanking me for staying late at work — without pay — to enter data.  I never knew she even knew that.

I only wish I had been able to do more.  Not that it was needed in the end (she won by ten percentage points) but because I believe in Cindy Chavez, what she stands for and who she is, and what she can and will do for the people of Santa Clara county.

It was an honor to work on her behalf.

I was part of a diverse team of people from all sorts of backgrounds, with all sorts of stories.  For the most part, we got along: there were occasions where we didn’t, but that’s true of any workplace. We were a team, one of which I was proud to be part of.

Being part of this team was important to me:  after the primary, the campaign changed from mostly phoning to walking precincts, which was beyond me at that point because of my injured knee.  When my knee recovered, I was able to return to working along everyone else, to being part of the team again, to having my own stories at the end of the day about the people I encountered.  Fewer than others, perhaps, as I ended up driving my coworkers a lot.

We had our moments — even me.  I am prone to insecurity, and pick up stress in those around me, which is not a helpful personal characteristic.  I worried more about parking regulations than I should have — I would have been more efficient had I ignored things like “No Stopping” signs more, and spent more time at doors.  Not that I didn’t do my part: driving people can be very tiring.*  And on the Saturday before the election, due to injury and work schedules of other team members, I ended up distributing door hangers with polling information all by myself.  The day before the election I did likewise (for reasons of efficiency, if nothing else).  I got to talk to some interesting voters, and enjoyed myself.

It seems odd to think that at this stage of life I have found something I enjoy as much as working campaigns.  It’s not all beer and skittles (or even beer and pizza**), and like every job I have held in my life, ever, I worry that I am not measuring up, that I am only marginally competent.  But I am getting better.

I told one of my supervisors at the election night party that campaign work is addicting.  It really is.  I feel like I am working to make the world a better place, that I am helping along the process of representative democracy; that, in some very small way, America is better for what I do.  It may be delusional, but all of us need meaning in our lives, and this helps me find that meaning.

On a less exalted level, campaign work makes me stronger: it forces me out of my shell, and has made me develop a thicker skin.  The work is an exercise in letting go: each new interaction with a voter is unique, and you can’t be thinking about the offensive twit you just dealt with.  You hang up, or walk away from the door, and you start fresh with the next person.  And for every voter who hangs up, or who shuts a door on you, there are other who are friendly and enthusiastic.***

My boss at the Census wrote in my LinkedIn recommendation that I was best suited for projects with defined goals.  He is right, and a campaign is just that:  you work towards a goal, election night arrives, and you are either successful or not, but the project (except for the analysis — and the drinking) is done.  Then, in a few months, there will hopefully be another campaign to work on.  The trick is finding things to do between campaigns.

I am now probably going on to another gig, which I can’t really talk about yet — if for no other reason than I haven’t signed the paperwork yet.  I am a little leery of talking about any job until I have actually been put on payroll.

In the meantime, I have a couple of weeks to just bask in the glow of a well-earned victory.

*A useful side effect of all that driving was that I now have a rudimentary grasp of the geography of a large chunk of San Jose.  I went to the San Jose Giants game on Wednesday, and was able to get to the stadium without getting lost or resorting to Google Maps.  I got turned around getting out of the park (it was inevitable), but was able to get home by remembering that Alma turned into Minnesota, which intersected with Bird, which ran to I-280.

**Campaigns run on pizza, caffeine and chocolate, but there can be too much of a good thing: when our group was broken up into small teams, one team selected as their  name (and slogan) “No More Pizza, Man.”  This was greeted with cheers and laughter.

***While walking and knocking on doors, I discovered that people are usually nicer than over the phone.  Oddly, I encountered were people who announced they were voting for the opposition, but who then wished me luck.  One woman went so far as to commend my efforts, even though she strongly opposed my candidate.

Posted in Politics, Work! | Tagged | Leave a comment

Sometimes you have to laugh to keep from crying.

There are times when the jokes are just too easy.

Except for the horrible impact on women’s reproductive rights, of course.

Posted in Feminism, Social Issues | Leave a comment

Aarghhhhh!!!

Dear WordPress;  telling me I can paste text from Word, is great.  Messing up the spacing on that text, not so great.  Not letting me edit the text, abysmal.

Posted in Blogging | Leave a comment

The kids are all right. I will be too.

It is August.  The school year will be starting in a couple of weeks.

It will be my family’s last school year.

The Red-Headed Menace will be a senior next year.  I will never have to go to Back-To-School Night, parent-teacher conferences, IEPs, or attendance meetings after next year.  (Hopefully, I will get through the year without having to go to the last, but I am not really sanguine about it.)

I won’t have to buy school supplies.  I won’t be sitting at track meets with other cheering parents.  I won’t get spam from the PTSA. I won’t have to freak out about whether I have missed the SAT deadlines.

I won’t have to yell at anyone about losing the $100 graphing calculator.  I won’t need to doublecheck that anyone is indeed working his way through Pride and Prejudice, and not leaving it for the last minute.

I won’t have a schedule bounded by starting bells and finals periods.

I’m going to miss all that.  I have been in the K-12 system for sixteen years now – that’s a long time.  It’s time to do something else with my life.

Posted in Family, KIds | Leave a comment

Loving my neighbor.

I have been thinking the past few days about the Bible.  In particular, about the phrase “love your neighbor as yourself.”  I have heard far too many people say this who clearly have no idea of what it means.

For those unfamiliar with the exact context, it occurs in the Gospel of Luke.  A young man asks Jesus what the two greatest commandments are, and Jesus answers, “Love your God with all your heart and soul, and love your neighbor as yourself.”

The young man then asks a very important follow-up: who is my neighbor?

Jesus responds with the parable of the Good Samaritan.  A man is set upon by thieves, left for dead, and is rescued by a Samaritan, after being ignored by a priest and a Levite.  The Samaritan takes the injured man to an inn, and arranges for his care.  It has found its way into popular argot as an expression for anyone who helps a stranger in trouble.

It is impossible to separate this parable from the social and historical context in which it exists, however.  The Good Samaritan does more than help a stranger, he helps a stranger of a group of people who actively despise him.  Samaritans were the scum of the earth in Judea, and the Samaritan would have been quite justified in ethnic terms had he chosen to walk past and spit on the unfortunate victim.  That he chose not to is remarkable.

Jesus’s message was not merely that everyone is your neighbor, but that everyone even the people you despise most for whatever reason is your neighbor.

The annoying salesguy at Fry’s is my neighbor.

The telemarketer who called earlier today is my neighbor.

The guy who cut me off in traffic is my neighbor.

Tea Partiers are my neighbors.

Rand Paul and Paul Ryan are my neighbors.

Rush Limbaugh is my neighbor.

Glenn Beck is my neighbor.

Bernie Madoff is my neighbor.

Charles Manson is my neighbor.

What this means is that there is in all of us a common humanity, an indefinable quality that cannot be destroyed by anything we can do.  I have trouble believing in God, but I do believe in people.

This is why I oppose capital punishment.  Why I choose to support the right of people to get a living wage and access to health care. Why I am deeply troubled by assisted-suicide.  Why abortion greatly saddens me, even as I staunchly defend the right of any woman to make whatever decisions are right for her.

This is why current political and social discourse, with its emphasis on demonizing those with whom we disagree, appalls me.  What appalls me even more is my own tendencies to engage in such demonization, even as I believe that it is morally unacceptable.

I work on this.  I just wish I had some support from society at large in doing so.

Posted in God faith and theology, Justice | Tagged | Leave a comment

It is a beautiful day.  I have been lazy in it.  I have been lazy for the past six days, since election night ended my temporary employment.

I miss work.  I miss the people I work for, and especially the people I work with.  I miss the work, and the sense of purpose it gave me.  I am even beginning to miss the pizza.

 But just today I am filled with a sense of wonder at the world around me.  Even my annoyance at having to deal with Fry’s has not killed that.  Even the Internet being as slow as escargot has not dimmed that sense that it is possible for the world to ne a good and welcoming place. 

 

I am sitting at (where else?) one of my Starbucks – the one in Palo Alto just off the Stanford Campus, and it is light and airy.  It feels like home, again.

Have you ever thought about the blue sky? Or light? Or the sound of people’s voices?  Or why music affects us?  What in us is designed to respond to these things?

On days like this, it is very easy to believe in God.

 The essence of faith is, of course, believing in God during the darkness of the soul.  I find that impossible – at least in the past few years – which is why I no longer call myself a Christian.  It saddens me:  faith is a comfort.  I do not go so far as to say that God does not exist, simply that I cannot find Him far too much of the time.

 

 But today, I choose to believe that all of this cannot be an accident of the universe.  I may be deluding myself, but then I have suffered from deeper, more damaging delusions in my life. 

 

 It’s all good, in the end.

 

Posted on by Pat Greene | Leave a comment

Adventures in retail.

Note to Canon:

If you presume to sell the public a “combo pack” of ink and paper, do us all a favor and include ALL the cartridges the printer needs?  Otherwise we have to ask obnoxious, ignorant salespeople to price out the separate cartridges individually, which is a pain in the butt.

 

 

Note to salesman at Fry’s Electronics:

Unless I ask you what ink my printer takes, do NOT presume to tell me that I have picked up the wrong ink. All you needed to do was tell me the price of the damn cartridges, since your shelves are in complete chaos and whatever prices are listed there seem to have no relation to what you’re charging, as was obvious when you did bother to look it up.  For your information, my printer takes two different black ink cartridges, each with slightly different numbers.  If you had been paying attention, you would have noticed that the black ink cartridge I picked up shared the same number as the colors in the combo pack, while the black in the combo pack had a different number.  I have had this printer for years and know quite well what ink it needs.

Oh, and you other Fry’s salesman?  About following me when I said I wanted help with ink, and then abandoning me halfway to the ink aisle for a woman who said she needed help buying a computer?  NOT cool. I realize you are probably on commission, but this sort of crappy customer service loses your employer customers.

 

 

Note to Self:

Don’t shop at Fry’s Electronics.

 

Posted in My life and times | Leave a comment

To whichever of my coworkers insisted that I really needed to try the “dark flight” at Steins Beer Garden in Mountain View…

A) you were right and B) this is your fault that I am BWI (blogging while intoxicated).  On the other hand, you didn’t tell me about the kick-ass pluot beer, with its gem-like orange color and ten percent alcohol…. I found that all  on my own.

I think I need rum….

 

Posted on by Pat Greene | Leave a comment

The Trayvon Martin George Zimmerman verdict is in.  It should not have surprised anyone, really:  whatever issues Florida has in the legal treatment of whites and minorities aside, the prosecution did not do a particularly good job at disproving Zimmerman’s claim of self-defense.  Under Florida law, a) self-defense is still a valid defense even if the defendant originally initiated the encounter as long as they believe that they are in danger of death or great bodily harm and have exhausted other means of escape, and b) in any case, the burden of proof lay with the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman was not acting in self-defense.*

Zimmerman’s defense team chose a standard self-defense claim.  Florida’s “stand your ground” law was never in play.  It should have been.

What about Trayvon Martin’s right to stand his ground? Why should he be forced to give way when stalked and harassed?  Why should he not have the right to defend himself when he felt in fear of great bodily harm?

Oh, that’s right.  He didn’t have a gun.  Doesn’t count.

Posted on by Pat Greene | Leave a comment

I’m still here.

It’s been a long time (okay, two months), since I wrote with any regularity.  I am hoping to change that.

I have been working, which takes up some time, and I have been writing other things, which takes up more.  It is also summer, which…. let’s just say that the season and I are not friends.

I have also been writing other pieces.  One is a chapter in a book on mothering with disabilities, put together by a couple of academics in New York, and the other is a piece on living with disabilities, which I am writing mainly for my doctors but if they think it is any good I am going to try and disseminate it elsewhere.

There is so much to write about:  the momentous last week of the Supreme Court, the shenanigans in the Texas legislature, the BART strike and unionism in general, and the state of the family and the generally amusing interactions with my kids.

I did fail to write a post about my anniversary on July 2d, which was a massive oversight, as it was a decade mark: thirty years.  I wrote a pretty good anniversary post a couple of years ago, though.  However, I do have some recommendations from the Rocket Scientist’s and my short trip:  the Green Gables Inn in Pacific Grove is wonderful, as is the restaurant Passionfish.  And for the fans of Alexander’s in Cupertino, their new restaurant The Sea on El Camino in Palo Alto is even better.  Same amazing quality of food, but the atmosphere is lighter and warmer.  They even have the cotton candy.  (Lime, in our case.)

At any rate, the world still turns and I am still in it, so that is enough to be going on with for now.

Posted in Blogging, Writing | Tagged | Leave a comment

I don’t understand this.

I got a rejection letter for a job that I had really, REALLY wanted this morning.  It was the standard, “although we are impressed with your credentials, your skills and experience are not compatible with our current job opening,” which reads very much as “yeah, right.”

I had applied for this job four months ago.  I had long ago given up hope that I would actually get it.  I figured that it had been filled, and as is the case in so many job-search related situations, they had just never bothered to tell me. 
I had given up any hope.  So why, why, WHY does this upset me so much?

Is it because it secretly reinforces my belief that I am incapable of work that requires more than a high-school degree?  That I am more or less incompetent?

I know the latter is not true, because I am doing well at my current job (which I have been forbidden to write about).  But it is a temporary position, and I am pessimistic about what happens after that.

Oh, well.  Time to shake it off — I have to go to work.

Posted in My life and times | Tagged | 1 Comment

Storytelling.

I am working on two different yet similar writing projects currently. They present me with a dilemma.

Each of these pieces require me to tell my life story.  They will be for different audiences, and therefore will have different emphases, but nonetheless there will be quite a bit of overlap. One of them is a chapter in a book on parenting and disabilities, the other is essentially a spec piece for some professionals I know.

The question then becomes… how do I keep from plagiarizing myself?  The lawsuit against John Fogerty notwithstanding, is it even possible for me to plagiarize myself?

There is a strong temptation to cut and paste from various sources that I have written (including blog posts), stitch them together and leave it at that.  I find that process to be intellectually troublesome, even though it would certainly be easiest from a logistical standpoint.

Yet, to rewrite everything would be to reinvent the wheel.

The compromise that I seemed to have reached with myself is convoluted, and possibly not worth the trouble:  I will cut and paste all the relevant parts that I have already written from whatever source, reorder them so they make sense (the pieces fall in different order in each of the projects) and write bridges to fill in the gaps.  Then I will strip away all of the verbiage for the nonoriginal parts, leaving behind the bare bones of what happened.

Then I will let it sit.  Not too long, as one of the pieces has a four week turnaround time, and that includes having it sent in for editing, but certainly at least a week.

Then I will rewrite.

Hopefully, I will get two pieces which tell the same story with the same truths, but in different ways.

Hopefully.

Besides which, I am bad about rewriting anyway, and this will require discipline on my part, which is always a good thing.

Posted in My life and times, Who I am, Writing | Tagged | Leave a comment

Still not there yet.

I am still trying to come to grips with the Steve Landsburg piece on letting people die enough so that I can write a cogent analysis of it.  Part of the issue is that I am busy doing other things, but the bigger problem is that the piece is in itself so bizarre and irrational (while seeming intelligent and scholarly) that it is difficult to tease out where to begin to discuss it.

It falls into that frustrating category of “this is absolutely completely wrong but it sounds good but I know it is a load of crap and I can’t begin to pick it apart.”  Law school was supposed to give me the tools to completely demolish arguments like that, and usually I can.  I have noticed, however,  that the more absolutely batshit crazy an argument is — especially if it is phrased in “academic” or “economic” terms — the harder it is for me to wrap my head around.

I like to think that this is because I am simply too nice a person to be able to put myself into such a borderline sociopathic headspace, but it’s probably something less exalted.

Posted in Politics, Social Issues, Who I am | Tagged | Leave a comment

*Now* you tell us.

Dear Sandra Day O’Connor:

Don’t you think it is a little late to come to the conclusion that SCOTUS should never have granted cert. in Bush v. Gore?  As in, twelve years which saw a major terrorist attack on American soil resulting in 3,000 dead, two wars and the total trashing of American civil liberties, not to mention the erosion of America’s moral standing in the world,  too late?

I would have a great deal more sympathy for your position had you not been such a Republican hack at the time.  I know you may well regret the black mark that this decision represents on your role  in history, but that’s no excuse.  Nothing has changed in the essentials of the law in the past twelve years to make the decision any worse than it was at the time.

You and four of your compatriots screwed the country royally, and there is far too much water under the bridges we burned both at home and abroad to allow me to give you a pass here simply because you have had second thoughts.

Posted in Politics, SCOTUS | Tagged | Leave a comment

Today, to go with the strained ligaments and the resulting crutches, I now have a bruise on my left wrist where a coworker nearly backed over me as I was getting my crutches out of the trunk of his car. On the good side, I only had to spend a couple of hours in the Stanford ER before they discovered it was not broken, only bruised.

And today, I have bruises under my arms from beginning to use the crutches.  I can’t use the crutches in the house — the passageways are too narrow — so I have to spend a lot of time not really moving.  I am really tired today, perhaps because of the physical exertion of getting around and just the stress of the past couple of days, so napping is good.

I am, however, looking forward to using the crutches to develop the strength in my arms and upper back.  I also think that if I can find a warm pool to walk in — where I can move and strengthen my quads but where I am not putting weight on my knee — I’ll be in good shape.  I am almost excited about the prospect.

Almost.

Posted on by Pat Greene | Leave a comment