A probably underappreciated act of courage.

James Holmes, who shot up an Aurora, Colorado movie theater a couple of years ago, escaped the death penalty this week. The jury could not unanimously agree that he should be executed.

The jury hung because of one juror. One juror.

Almost like a Hollywood movie, wouldn’t you say? Except this juror didn’t sway the others; on the other hand, she didn’t need to. The other jurors were presumably not happy with Juror 17; one of them had requested earlier in the day that the videos of the carnage at the movie theater be shown to the jury. Juror 17 believes it was an attempt to sway the holdout (i.e., her). It didn’t work.

Juror 17 held her ground because she thought Holmes mentally ill.  Not so mentally ill as to not be guilty of the crime, but ill enough that he should not be sentenced to death. The prosecutor disagreed, as well as at least some of the families, who burst into tears upon hearing the sentence.

For some perspective, consider that this woman clearly does believe that the death penalty is warranted sometimes — people who believe otherwise don’t serve on juries in capital cases. She also had to know that she was facing a storm of crap coming her way. If it had split any other way, that might not be so, but a lone holdout is going to get grief from a lot of different quarters.

It would have been so very easy for her to slip her conscience in her back pocket. I mean, after all, his appeals are going to take years, and there is always the  chance an appellate court will reduce his sentence, isn’t there? She refused to do that, refused to take what might have been the easier road. Acting in the finest tradition of American law, she did what we want all jurors to do: she examined the facts laid before her, and the law as given her by the judge, and she did what she believed to be right, regardless of what her fellow jurors thought.

Good for her. She’s going to need that strength of character in the upcoming weeks, I’ll wager.

Posted in Justice | Tagged | Leave a comment

Thank you, Jon Stewart.

Because I really do want to remember this:

Bullshit is everywhere. There is very little you will encounter in life that has not been, in some way, infused with bullshit — not all of it bad. General day-t0-day organic free-range bullshit is often necessary, or at the very least innocuous. “Oh, what a beautiful baby! I’m sure he’ll grow into that head.”  That kind of bullshit in many ways provides important social contract fertilizer and keeps people from making each other cry all day.  But then there’s your pernicious premeditated institutional bullshit designed to obscure and distract. Designed by whom? The Bullshit Talkers.

It comes in three basic flavors: one, to make bad things sound good: “organic all-natural cupcakes.” Because “factory made sugar oatmeal balls” doesn’t sell. Patriot Act, because “Are you scared enough to let me look at all your phone records?” Act doesn’t sell. So whenever something’s been titled Freedom, Fairness, Family,  Health, or America, take a good long sniff. Chances are it’s been manufactured in a facility that may contain traces of bullshit.

Number 2, the second way, is hiding the bad things under mountains of bullshit. Complexity — you know that I would love to download Drizzy’s latest …. But I’m not really interested right now in reading Tolstoy’s  iTunes agreement, so I’ll just click “agree” even if it grants Apple prima noctae with my spouse. Here’s another one — simply put, banks shouldn’t be able to bet your pension money on red. Bullshitly put, it’s hey! this. [The Dodd-Frank Act, all 2,300 pages of it]. Hey, a handful of billionaires can’t buy our elections, right? Of course not; they can only pour unlimited anonymous cash into a 501 (c)4 if 50% is devoted to issue education, otherwise they’d have to 501(c)6 it or funnel it openly through non-campaign-coordinating SuperPAC  with a quarter- “I think they’re asleep now. We can sneak out.”

And finally, it’s the bullshit of infinite possibility. These bullshitters cover their unwillingness to act under the guise of unending inquiry.  We can’t do anything because we dont’ yet know everything. We can’t take action on climate change until everyone in the world agree that gay marriage vaccines won’t cause our children to marry goats who are gonna come for our guns. Until then, I say, teach the controversy.

Now, the good news is this: bullshitters have gotten pretty lazy, and their work is easily detected.  And looking for it is a pleasant way to pass the time, like an “I-Spy” of bullshit. So I say to you tonight friends that the best defense against bullshit is vigilance.  So if you smell something, say something.

Posted in Culture (popular and otherwise), Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Consistency, people.

I heard a msnbc commentator this evening say “Everyone is rightfully upset — and should be — by the fetal tissue sale, but Republicans should not shut down the government to defund Planned Parenthood.” My first reaction was “Yeah, those videos were doctored, but it is very troubling.” Then I thought…

I firmly support women’s right to choose to terminate her pregnancy.

I have given blood, both whole and platelets.

I am listed as an organ donor on my driver’s license.

Had any of my children died suddenly, I would have donated their organs to those who could use them.

If I had my druthers, I would have everything of my body that could be given away donated, and everything that could be used to teach students given to schools, and when everything was done the remaining flesh would be boiled from my bones and my skeleton would be hung up in a classroom somewhere.

So why should I be upset that fetal tissue from legal abortions is used in research? And why should I be upset that Planned Parenthood takes a small (less than $100)  fee to facilitate the transfer of fetal tissue (voluntarily given by patients) to companies that get it to researchers?  Why should I be upset, when if I had had an abortion I would have donated the fetal tissue myself?

So much of the outrage to this issue from all quarters is a visceral “squick” reaction informed by gut feeling rather than thoughtful reasoning.

That’s no way to run a railroad, as Daffy Duck would say, and certainly no way to make public policy or determine government spending.

Posted in Politics, Science, Social Issues | Tagged , | Leave a comment

My favorite Voice performances.

I have all this … stuff… I need to write about. Donald Trump and his lawyer, Jonathan Pollard, Bernie Sanders, the Rio Tinto Mining Company’s horrible plans for sacred lands and the general scandal that is the use of public resources by private companies generally, ruminating on faith and other issues. I actually have a post started about how annoying Malcolm Gladwell is.  And so I am writing about…. The Voice.

Yes, I know, The Voice is still scheduled to start another season on September 21, Blake Shelton’s divorce not withstanding. Blake’s behavior at times last season was occasionally erratic, even for a guy as over-the-top as he has tended to be. The drinking schtick has gotten quite old, for example, as well as his flirting with contestants. I don’t know what precipitated his divorce with Miranda Lambert, but am sure none of that helped. My hunch is that the show won’t be quite the same.

So herewith my favorite Voice performances (keeping in mind that I started watching in Season 4) in no particular order:

“Fields of Gold,” Joshua Davis, Season 8.

“Wasted Love,” Matt McAndrew, Season 7. (Although this version by Sarah Potenza in Season 8 may be better.)

“A Case of  You,” James Wolpert Season 5

“Signed, Sealed and Delivered,” Josh Kauffman and Delvin Choice, Season 6.

“I Feel Good,” Anthony Riley, Season 8. (Best blind audition ever, demonstrated by all four chairs turning within about ten seconds of him starting. His undeniable talent made his withdrawal from the competition due to substance abuse issues and subsequent suicide even more tragic than it would have been otherwise.)

“Turn the Page,” The Swon Brothers, Season 4.

“Shine On,” Sawyer Fredericks, Season 8.

“Some Kind of Wonderful,” Craig Wayne Boyd, Season 7.

“Stay With Me,” Josh Kauffman, Season 6. (Josh Kauffman, Season 6 winner, got a starring role in the revival of Pippin on Broadway. How cool is that?)

And the best, by far,

“I Knew You Were Trouble,” Michelle Chamuel. Season 4. Chamuel turns an uptempo pop song into growling rocker. I love this woman.

I would have included Caroline Glaser’s performance of Ed Sheeran’s “The A Team,” but unfortunately her live performance was merely adequate. (In fact she didn’t advance.) Her studio version is wonderful — it is one of my favorite songs from The Voice. It is also one of the songs (in addition to several listed above) where I prefer The Voice version to the original.  (“Fields of Gold” is kind of tricky — I prefer Joshua Davis’s version to Sting’s original, but both pale next to the Eva Cassidy cover.)

So I’ll be tuning in next season, with the hope that the talent keeps improving as it did the past two seasons. (Season 6 was kind of a low point.)

What about you?

Posted in Culture (popular and otherwise) | Tagged | Leave a comment

Letters…

Dear Rick Santorum:

How in God’s green earth did you make through your time in the Senate without learning how the Constitution worked? Either you did, and you are dissembling so that the base will like you (although, to be honest, you probably lost beaucoup points with them for even appearing on the Rachel Maddow Show to begin with) or you really DON’T understand basic civics. In either case, you are unfit to be president.

Let me put it this way: you and other conservatives were quick to urge the Supreme Court to invalidate the mandates of the Affordable Care Act in the Hobby Lobby case. But there is no way that the Founders could even have foreseen the issue which faced the court. That did not stop any of you from claiming, successfully, that it fell under the First Amendment’s Free Exercise clause. There is no way any of you would argue that the Supreme Court’s decision in that case should be overridden by Congress, regardless of whether public opinion supported the contraception mandate.

That’s because the Court, not Congress, decides the parameters of the Constitution. The Bill of Rights exists to protect individuals from the majority, or in the case the vocal minority. And quoting a majority opinion in a case the court overruled (Bowers v. Hardwick) and dissents in a cases that went against you (Lawrence v. Texas, Obergfell v. Hodges) to support the point you are making means you know squat. And your vague “We need different judges,” while it no doubt plays to your base, is an empty threat and you know it.

******

Dear Rachel Maddow:

When I first saw who your guest was, I was frankly incredulous. Rick Santorum? Rick Santorum? A man who views your kind as an abomination? The man whose name you Google at your peril? Seriously???

The first part of the interview did little to assuage my disgust. Talking with this man who equated gay sex with sex with dogs calmly and gently about the primaries and the Donald Trump effect seemed like pandering.

But then… you confronted him.  Still in your pleasant “I’m just talking here” way that has endeared you to me from your first show, you got the man to show exactly how ignorant he was.  (Not to mention show how uncomfortable he was being confronted with his past horrible statements. You definitely gave rhetoric teachers across the country a great example of the Appeal to Authority fallacy when he claimed Justice White (who wrote the majority in Bowers) and Justice Scalia (who wrote dissents in Lawrence and Obergfell) as support.

I’m still not entirely happy you had Santorum on, but I guess overall you redeemed yourself.

Posted in Culture (popular and otherwise), Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Sigh. Again.

I am beginning to sympathize with honest policemen.

What with all the cops who have been implicated in killings over the past few years, it must be hard to be a good cop. I have never doubted that they are out there — even as there are cities with horrible histories of police brutality, such as Cleveland or Baltimore, there are cities who firmly believe in treating the community respectfully. Richmond, California comes to mind.

But being a cop in those cities must be made immeasurably harder by those responsible for the deaths of Freddie Gray, and Eric Garner, and Tamir Rice, just to name three of the African-American men and boys killed senselessly. You can add the suspicious death of Sandra Bland to that list.

But I am currently thinking about those good cops right now because of the shooting in Chattanooga. Recent news reports state that his family was worried about his depression, and that he wrote in his diaries of wanting to kill himself.

Given that and the Germanwings pilot earlier this year who committed murder-suicide, I can just hear the the discussions now about how people who are depressed or suicidal pose a danger to everyone about them.

I am sure that there are those now who will think twice about being friends with people suffering from depression; employers who would not hire anyone with such a history. It’s illegal, of course, but what’s the law — especially if you know that it is unlikely that you would ever be caught — against what you think is personal safety? The fact that most people who are depressed (even most men) are a danger to no one but themselves — and, depending upon their circumstances, maybe not even that — might weigh very little. It’s why most people cannot talk about their disability at work. It’s why I am now going to take one of my two publications off my resume.

It should be unnecessary for me to say it but the truth is that most people who commit violent crimes are not mentally ill. Dylann Roof, for example: driven by a evil ideology, he gunned down nine people in a house of worship.  In the ensuing debate about his mental health, I lost a friend. In this case, it was my choice not to remain friends with someone who insisted that “anyone who commits murder must be mentally ill” and who refused to see how so many people take that statement and reverse it.

A doctor I saw recently told me how brave I was to be open about my disorder. Funny but I never felt brave. I felt driven, and committed. I knew that I had lost people who had decided being friends with someone like me was too much trouble, or too scary. I decided it was worth it to be honest, and to hopefully be a counterweight to all the news stories about violent mentally ill people. I told the doctor in question that I looked for inspiration to the generation of gay men and lesbians who had come out of the closet and eased the stigma of being gay. Maybe, by coming down from the attic, I could help do the same.

I have felt resolute.

Right now, though, I feel worried. And I tell myself that I am overreacting, that, the Chattanooga shooter notwithstanding, things are getting better.

I tell myself that, but I don’t think I believe it.

Edited to add: Almost like they read my mind, Cracked.com published a very perceptive article on bipolar disorder from a woman who suffers from it.

Posted in Social Issues | Tagged | Leave a comment

Espagna. Or Mars, maybe.

[This was a post I wrote while on the road, but didn’t publish, until now.]

This isn't Mars, but could play it on TV.

This isn’t Mars, but could play it on TV.

Today I am in Nerva, Spain. The Rocket Scientist has a project underway at Minas Rio Tinto (Rio Tinto Mine) a few kilometers away. As a result, I am sweltering in a small Andalusian town in the middle of nowhere.

Not that this bothers me: on the contrary, in every vacation you need days when you just stop and rest, especially when the temperature is 84F at 10 a.m. Sitting inside and drinking soda is just fine with me. (Otherwise, I would have walked down to the square and sat in a cafe drinking cafe con leche. There’s not a lot to do in Nerva. )

The project, like all of the Rocket Scientist’s projects, requires an analog for Mars. Rio Tinto is one such analog: a harsh, barren, landscape decimated by decades of mining by the British firm that took its name from the area. (The same British mining concern has wrought ecological havoc a lot of other places in the world, sadly. Most recently, Congress voted to allow them access to Apache sacred sites to strip mine for copper.)

When I look at the landscape, I am struck by how much beauty there is in the desolation. The colors run together, from pale sand through buff and orange and red into purple. There is beauty almost everywhere, even in a place I keep finding myself mentally referring to as “Minas Morgul.” (“One does not simply walk into Mordor… one takes an SUV to haul equipment with.”) And I am struck by the dedication of the scientists working in these conditions, especially when the temperature hit 108F, as it did yesterday.

IMG_0274

Where’s Frodo and Sam?

It’s like a lot of research, both space related and not: men and women willing to go to far away places, often under harsh conditions, to learn things. It’s not an easy job; I couldn’t do it, and not just because I don’t have the training. Sitting in a 108F tent in Southwestern Spain watching a drill is not my idea of a fun time. Nor is running the same drill in the Antarctic. Yes, some scientist have jobs that involve them spending time on exotic South Seas islands, but more of them involve work that is far less glamorous.

One of my pet peeves with Americans is their thoughtlessness when it comes to major scientific achievements.* These things take work, people. Yes, astronauts are heroes, but so are all the engineers and scientists who put in very long hours to get astronauts into space. People grumble when an unmanned mission goes awry about the waste of tax dollars, and perhaps they should, but they should also understand the long hours and dedication put in to get things skyward in the first place, and the grief of all those responsible who have just seen the work of years of their lives destroyed.

The Rocket Scientist was annoyed when he heard that Ron Howard was making Apollo 13. NASA had just had a serious of mission failures, and he thought that the movie would be just another “See how incompetent these guys are?” slap at the agency. Instead, the movie was, if anything, a love letter to the scientists and engineers who are always in the background but who are  indispensable to any mission. (No man is an island. That includes astronauts.)

The Rocket Scientist, and his colleagues, and his comrades-in-arms in countries throughout the world make us better off by what they do. True, not all science results in discoveries that have everyday applications (although NASA missions sometimes do), but knowing more about our planet and our universe makes us smarter. We are by nature curious beings; exploration, whether physical or scientific fills that driving need. I don’t know about you, but knowing that there is somebody out there studying mantis shrimps — a creature I will probably never encounter — makes me happy. The spirit-lifting effect of “Wow, that’s so cool!” cannot be overestimated.

I am proud that I know these men and women, and I salute them and the work they do. Besides, sending a drill to Mars to help find signs of life strikes me as somewhat a tilting at windmills, and as you know that’s an activity I approve of.

IMG_0272

This could be Mars, too. Except for the blue sky. And the trees. And the Porta-Potty.

*Not just scientific achievements, either: Frank Gehry’s name may be the one associated with the Bilbao Guggenheim, but you can bet he had a crack team of engineers making sure that the building inspired by fish did not simply crumble into the river.

Posted in Science, Travel (real or imaginary) | Leave a comment

Madrid, I don’t know how to quit you. Or vice versa, as the case may be.

Today. Is. So. Fired.

Today really started yesterday, when I got very sick late in the evening. (I was feeling more or less — maybe less — okay, then had paella and a half pitcher of sangria. In my defense…. paella!) This morning, when I woke up short on sleep, the thought of ingesting anything made me wince.

Oddly enough for us, The Rocket Scientist and I left for the airport a few minutes before schedule. I thought this was a good omen. Hah!

RS dropped me off at Terminal 2, and I proceeded to the TAP Portugal counter. Pursuant to his instructions, I requested that my bags be checked all the way through SFO. (I had a paid ticket to Oporto, and then a reward ticket from Oporto to SFO.) The young man at the counter did so, then seemed confused, then frustrated, and then he brought in his colleagues, and  after half an hour I was sent on my way.

Because of  my fibromyalgia, I ask for mobility assistance at airports. I can walk, but I am very slow, and my capacity for walking through long concourses is limited, especially if I want to be able to function at the other end. This applies to international travel in spades. The way that Madrid handles mobility assistance is that people are brought to a waiting area until their gate opens. I was parked at the waiting area near my gate, only to be told that the plane is delayed.

A young woman with the mobility assistance team took my passport and boarding pass and left. I hate when people do that — I get nervous in foreign airports without my passport. She returned a few minutes later, took a deep breath, and explained in broken English that the plane from Madrid to Oporto was so late I was going to miss my connecting flight to Newark.

I was concerned but calm. I also have a bridge in Brooklyn I need to talk to you about.

True, I only freaked out a little bit, but I did freak out. (I feel really sorry for this young woman. She was hung out to dry by the TAP gate agents, who should have been the ones to tell me in the first place that the connection was going to be a problem. For one thing, they spoke much better English than she did.) She and her colleague patted my hand and brought  me a glass of water, and I felt quite abashed.

One of the issues that has been plaguing me all this trip has been language gaps. I have them in English, and I might as well not be able to speak even tourist Spanish, as I can’t retain even the basic phrases. I can manage “gracias” and “por favor” and that’s about it. I am very hit or miss on “losiento” and “hola.” Towards the end of my stay I had mostly gotten down “salida” and “aseos.” On previous trips, I had developed a vocabulary of about thirty or so words, not including place names. I am down to, on a good day, six, as long as I remember to say “gracias” (with the appropriate Castilian lisp) rather than “grazie.” Being all alone in a country where I can’t make heads or tails of the language, running on three hours of sleep and no food and next to no water was a recipe for disaster for me.

That said, I have for the most part enjoyed this trip; for three quarters of it I was either in London, where language was of course no problem, or around someone who spoke at the worst fluent and at the best native Spanish. The past few days I have not been by myself, either; even though RS does not speak Spanish either, he has a good grasp of tourist phrases.

So after I calmed down (and my freak-outs tend to be of the sniffling and crying slightly variety, not the yelling variety), a couple of mobility gentlemen came and we got my previously checked luggage and headed to the TAP counter. I was not alone — about four other families were stranded who had connections that they needed to make. My case was complicated because of the duel ticket situation. TAP was going to put me up in a hotel for one night, and then United could find me something tomorrow.

Uh, no. The earliest United could send me out was on Wednesday (albeit from Madrid, not Oporto). I had managed to retain my composure enough to firmly request (just short of demand) that TAP relax their rules and spring for two nights hotel room, rather than the one that they claimed they could authorize. I was successful, and am now ensconced in a hotel for the next 32 hours.

We left the place we were staying at 6:45, arrived at the airport at 7:15. I left the airport six-and-a-half hours later. That’s six-and-a-half hours of my life I’ll never get back. Good times.

But it could certainly be worse. Nobody died and nobody went to jail, and at best I can tool around Madrid tomorrow (I like the city busses) and at worst I can sleep. I get meal vouchers from the hotel, although quite honestly I don’t think I’ll be eating anytime soon. (Even before last night, the Spanish diet heavy in meat (it must be a terrible country for vegetarians) was beginning to pall.)

Not to mention that all the chocolate we were bringing back is in my luggage, and I think that certainly counts as emergency rations, don’t you?

Posted in Travel (real or imaginary) | Tagged | Leave a comment

The pitfalls of “progress.”

Harmondsword is a small, quaint village hard under the approach of planes heading into Heathrow. That would be quaint not in the Disneyland or tourist sense, but in the “good heavens, people actually live in seventeenth century houses!” sense. (Not all houses are that old – some are modern.)

IMG_0225

Harmondsword Hall Guest House is reasonably priced inn (85 euros/night) in a lovely sixteenth century building, with large, American-sized rooms and a full English breakfast included. The Five Bells is a comfortable English pub about two short blocks away. (The Crown and Rose is even closer.) I strongly recommend anyone traveling to London who wants to stay near Heathrow for convenience’s sake consider this place.

I suggest you do so soon, however. In a few months almost all the houses – including the inn – will be demolished to make way for Heathrow’s third runway.

The night I stayed there, a local news crew did their broadcast from the garden of the Five Bells. The villagers were told that day which houses were to be demolished. The last piece the newsman did was asking the villagers what they thought about the Heathrow expansion.

Several villagers thought the expansion a good idea. They trotted out the same reasons as the government. It will be good for the economy. We can use the jobs. Not only newcomers: one of the supporters who looked like he was about fifty had lived in the village since he was born.

More opposed the expansion: in some cases, people who had lived there their entire lives, including a ninety-three year old man who lived in a sixteenth century house that his parents and grandparents had lived in before him. One woman, whose house was not going to be demolished, spoke of her well-loved garden that would become unusable. “They said they would soundproof my house, but I would still need earplugs to go outside!” I spoke to several of the more ardent activists afterwards in the bar and wished them the best of luck in their campaign.

Being driven into Heathrow, I saw the flip side of the coin: signs telling passersby: “Heathrow Expansion: Good for Heathrow. Good for Britain.”

Even supposing this were true (and the economic benefits of things like these are almost always overstated) little to none of those benefits will accrue to the villagers. They will lose their houses, some in which their families have lived for generations, and will be forced out into a brutal real estate and rental market. The London metropolitan area, like San Francisco and New York, has taken off, with the result that high costs have become a barrier to entry for home ownership, and rents have rocketed skyward.

On our side of the Atlantic, Congress has just given the President fast-track approval for the Trans-Pacific Partnership. This means that Congress will not be able to change or amend any part of the treaty – a treaty that they have not seen, partly because it is still being negotiated. From what I have read, though, it is much like NAFTA, the free-trade agreement Bill Clinton signed into law.

When NAFTA was being debated, one of the refrains I remember hearing was “sure, maybe we’ll lose manufacturing jobs, but we’ll gain technology jobs.” People espousing this position didn’t stop to think about the logistics of such a transfer: the workers displaced by the loss of manufacturing jobs lived, by and large, in Rust Belt and South, while the tech jobs were mostly in California. What should a textile worker in North Carolina do when their job disappeared? Move to Silicon Valley, where they would be unable to compete? (And increasingly these days, tech support and coding jobs are moving overseas anyway.) Pulling up stakes and moving is incredibly disruptive to people’s psyches, as is staying put and struggling to keep your head above water.

There seemed to be no plan to help people whose jobs headed south. It seemed as though the people didn’t matter, just the numbers. But, as in so many things in life, there are people behind those numbers; failing to take their welfare into account, including intangibles like sense of place, will only lead to unnecessary suffering.

After all, how do you measure a sense of community? Love for the place where you were brought up? Having friends that you can call on when lightning strikes and you need a hand? The color the sky turns on an autumn day? The way the pine trees line the ridgelines? Randy Travis wrote an entire song about this sort of thing.

“Progress,” however you want to measure it, always has victims. People lose their jobs to robots and treaty-encouraged offshoring, their homes to public works projects. That’s inevitable. But we need to do a better job of assessing intangible human costs when determining whether a project is worthwhile.

Posted in Politics, Social Issues | Leave a comment

Fin.

The Hermitage, Louvre, and Orsay: 1997.

The Metropolitan (NYC): 2003.

The Prado* and the Getty: 2004.

The Art Institute of Chicago: 2006.

The Uffizi and the Vatican: 2012.

The Tate Modern: 2015.

This was my list of the Top Ten art museums in the Western world, culled from several online lists.  While some lists had other museums (such as the National Gallery in DC or the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam), these ten seemed to be consistently praised.

I am now done.

I saw the Tate Modern on Sunday, for far too short a time. I was in a rushed and distracted frame of mind, so I am sure I did not do the museum justice.  I was also resistant to its charms because, quite frankly and somewhat sadly, I am not a fan of most art since about 1950 or so. (There are notable exceptions: I love Chagall, so much that I nearly named this computer Marc when I got it 2012. And Jasper Johns. And Edward Hopper, although the Tate Modern had no Hopper. There are a few others.) I like surrealism, however, and they had some great surrealist works, and I enjoyed the way that they grouped the paintings by concept rather than strictly chronologically. I can see that for people who like those genres of art, this would be a fantastic museum.

I have seen a great many other art museums, of course: the aforementioned National Gallery in DC, and the National Gallery and National Portrait Gallery  in London**, the Pompidou in Paris, and the Frick and MOMA in New York, Rijksmuseum and the Van Gogh museums in Amsterdam, the Thyssen-Bornemizsa in Madrid, museums dedicated to Franz Hals in Den Hague and Salvador Dali in St. Petersburg, Florida***, and the Bilbao Guggenheim, and so on….

But I worked my way through seeing all of my ten, my “bucket list,” if you will.  Of the ten, I love most of them, but for different reasons. The Met has two of my favorite paintings, and visiting it means seeing old friends.  The Prado, while showing me  paintings I always wanted to see (Goya’s “Third of May,” among others) gave me an appreciation for classic paintings that had never moved me before I was able to seem them first hand, rather than in pictures (Velazquez’s “Las Meninas”). The Vatican, Ufizzi, and AIC, likewise. The Getty introduced me to art that was totally new to me, and generated a love for early photography (Julia Cameron Mitchell’s work, for example).

I loved the Hermitage for its architecture and decorations as much as for its art.  (The have  a room with columns tiled in malachite! And a basin large enough to be a bathtub tiled over in lapis!) And while its art is not my proverbial cup of tea, I appreciated the way the Tate Modern arranged its work.

I was fortunate enough to visit several of the ten more than once: the Louvre, the Orsay, Prado and Met. I see chances in the future to visit several again: the American museums and the Prado.  Then there are the museums that were not on the list: the National Gallery in DC and the Rijksmuseum, which have paintings I love, and the Bilbao Guggenheim, which I love not for its collection of art, but for Frank Gehry’s architecture which beggars description.  It may be the most… amazing? exciting? I run out of words for it… building I have ever been in.

I feel a bit sad about coming to the end of this journey. Yes, I accomplished what I set out to do, and I feel happy about that, but I feel wistful about not having any more museums to work towards visiting.

I will no doubt continue to go to museums.  Art matters too much for me not to.

I do need a new bucket list, however.  In a previous post, I talked of seeing national parks. That seems both unattainable, and incomplete.  Maybe I could whittle it down to seeing a national park in every state… That would take a while , but I could certainly do it…

Let’s see: I’ve already gotten California, Tennessee, Colorado, Oregon, New Mexico, Washington, Utah, Arizona, Virginia, and Maryland, and if I count National Historic sites, I can include Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Tennessee… Should I include National Historic Sites? and National Battlefield Sites? So many decisions….

*I mentally include the Reine Sofia in with the Prado, pretty much since before it was split off several very important paintings such as Picasso’s “Guernica” hung in the Prado.

**Several lists included the British Museum, which is wonderful, but which focuses on archaeology rather than art. (I know the line between the two is sometimes blurry…)

***I have always thought that having a major museum dedicated to Salvador Dali in a rather odd place like St. Petersburg (which, although I love the place dearly, is not a well known hub of artistic activity) would please Dali. (The reason the museum is where it is is because one of Dali’s chief patrons lived in St. Pete.)

Posted in Art, Travel (real or imaginary) | Tagged | 1 Comment

Perspective.

Bowers v. Hardwick, upholding the right of states to enact and enforce sodomy laws, 1986.

Romer v. Evans, striking down Colorado’s anti-gay constitutional amendment, 1996.

Lawrence v. Texas, striking down sodomy laws, 2007.

United States v. Windsor, striking down part of the Defense of Marriage Act, 2013

And now, in 2015, Obergefell v. Ohio, extending same sex marriage rights to everyone throughout the land.

That’s thirty years.

Now, on to the fight for equal housing — for everyone, regardless of sexual orientation or race — and equal employment — for everyone, regardless of sexual orientation or race or disability status..

Posted in Politics, SCOTUS, Social Issues | Tagged | Leave a comment

It was a wonderful day.

When I graduated from Wellesley, if you had asked me, I would have said that, following Roe v. Wade, that reproductive rights were safe.  I would also have said that I would not see same-sex marriage legalized in my lifetime.  I was sadly mistaken on the first, and joyfully wrong on the second.

It was such a great day, even the sky was happy:

Sunset

Posted in My life and times, Social Issues | Tagged | 1 Comment

Why this matters….

The distinction I made in the last post (evil as opposed to mental illness) matters a great deal.  In a discussion in my Facebook, a friend said “People in their right minds don’t kill other people. Period. Whatever you want to call it…I would not want to work with someone who might decide to kill me, I do not want to be friends with them, since they might kill me, and I don’t want them marrying into my family since they might kill me.”

I responded “Do you think I might kill you?”

“No,” she shot back, “I know you….”

Exactly. She knows me.  She knows I would not hurt her, or anyone else. (I’ve never been a danger to anyone other than occasionally myself.) But if she didn’t, if all she knew about the mentally ill was what she saw on cable news and crime shows, if the words “mental illness” only brought forth images of Dylann Roof, Eliot Rogers, and Adam Lanza, then she might well refuse to work with me, or be friends with me, or have me marry into her family.  Because all she would know of mental illness — or most of what she would know of mental illness — would be that mentally ill people are a dangers to others.

Evil exists. Eliding the difference between it and mental illness presents real dangers of making lives even harder for a lot of people who have life difficult enough.

Posted in Social Issues | Tagged | Leave a comment

Let’s get one thing straight….

On Facebook, I have seen people insisting that Dylann Roof, the white supremacist who shot nine people in the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church had to have been mentally ill because “no one just walks into a church and shoots people unless he is mentally ill.” This before any information about his mental health history has been released.

Wrong.

No one has claimed the Boston bombers were mentally ill, or  the people behind 9/11.  They were not mentally ill but motivated by a vile and murderous ideology.

As was Dylann Roof.

Of course, all those other people were Muslims. We are willing to call them terrorists, but when a young white man who clearly has a white supremacist political and social agenda walks into — is welcomed into — a church with the historical importance of Mother Emanuel and shoots up the place we start looking for mental illness.

The arguments start that hatred and extremism are mental illnesses.  Funny, I don’t remember anyone claiming that about Islamic extremism when Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was on trial . Furthermore, that claim ignores that fact that extremism is learned behavior — learned from family, from peers, from the media, from society.  The moment we ignore that, we let a whole slew of people off of the hook for the poison they spew. Extremism can be renounced, a luxury which many of the mentally ill wish they had.

The arguments sound similar to those floated around Eliot Rogers, the Santa Barbara shooter. A lot of discussion arose about Rogers’s history of depression, which often ignored the virulent misogyny which was simply a more pronounced version than that which exists all around us.

Was Dylan Roof mentally ill? Who knows? According to news reports, he had not been diagnosed with any mental illness. I am sure that he will receive a thorough psychiatric evaluation before his trial. The best evidence seems to be that he would go on drunken rants in which he spewed his poisonous views. Bigots do that all the time.  The argument that “only someone mentally ill shoots up the church” begs the question of whether or not the gunman was in fact mentally ill.

Most crime is committed by people with no mental illness; the mentally ill are more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators.  Some (more than any reasonable society should tolerate) do end up on the street or in prison, but they are also all around you, and you may never know. As I have said before, here in Silicon Valley it is safer to come out of the closet than down from the attic.*

People with mental illness struggle with acceptance all the time.  Are we to be saddled with the burden of association with such a man?

*Case in point: ever since the publication of Motherhood and Mental Illness: Stories of Recovery and Hope, to which I contributed a chapter, I have been open about my bipolar disorder. I thought it was a little silly to have a published article in which I described my life and still keep hidden.  I was talking to coworkers in a bar after our shift, and the subject came up.  When I mentioned that I was bipolar, a coworker quietly said “I’m bipolar too.” I had worked with them for three years. In that time we had discussed a lot of parts of our personal history, and neither of us had felt comfortable talking about our shared issues.

Posted in Social Issues | Tagged | Leave a comment

What’s been up with me.

I was sick most of the past sick weeks. I had a viral infection the first week in May during which I ran a fever of 102 or higher for days, followed by viral bronchitis. Over Memorial Day weekend, I ended up in the hospital with “post-viral encephalitis.”  The doctors said that the encephalitis was not caused by the virus, but was an immune system reaction to the virus. (At least, that’s what I think they said.) I was released only to end up in the hospital a few days later with complications.  I ended up in the hospital for ten days (although the last few of those was so that they could change around my meds under supervision).

The encephalitis has (hopefully temporarily) damaged my memory. It’s getting better, and the cognition problems (I could not read at all well) which scared the crap out of me are mostly gone. (If your entire self-identity is tied into how smart you are, cognitive problems threaten your entire sense of who you are.)

One of the downsides is that I have not been writing as much as I want to. I did manage two or three substantive posts in that time, but I had intended to start writing much more. (Also, those posts were difficult to write. This one is a bit easier, but still hard.) I have a lot of issues that I wanted to write about (the Germanwings tragedy and the Nebraska decision to ban the death penalty to name but two), but between illness and just plain forgetting, I didn’t get to them. I may write about them anyway, as writing exercises.

So, that’s what’s been up with me.

One thing I do want to say, though…..

Yay Warriors!!!!!!

You guys, and Oakland, deserve that championship.

Posted in My life and times | Tagged | 1 Comment