This is me, patting myself on the back.

[This is my exercise in self-esteem.  Please feel free to ignore.]

My job coach told me to take time to appreciate myself.  In that spirit, I decided to reread my last two weeks of posts as though they were written by someone else.

I discovered that, although the writing was uneven, on the whole it was fairly good.  More importantly, I’ve decided that if the person writing this blog were someone else, I’d like to meet them in person because they seem interesting and amusing.

Maybe I should ask myself out to coffee.

Posted in nothing special | Leave a comment

Beautiful, again.

After my post the other night, “Pretty and Beautiful,” I have been trying to tease out what I find beautiful.

Uniqueness.  The late great Amy Winehouse was beautiful in spite of all of her issues because she always came across as unabashedly her totally-unlike-anyone-else self. Uniqueness is not always beautiful (there is also unique horror, and unique evil), but it goes a long way.

Humor. Many of the people in my life whom I consider beautiful (male and female) have active senses of humor. As Jessica Rabbit said about Roger, I love them because they make me laugh. There is a particular type of humor that appeals to me: sly, intelligent, occasionally self-deprecating, and aware of the absurdities of the world.  These people understand — and appreciate — irony.*

Compassion, gentleness, warmth, intelligence, curiosity, critical thinking skills, fierce determination, emotional strength… the beautiful people I know have most (or all) of these.  Not all the time, but enough that I cannot help but notice and admire them. Not that they are perfect: perfect people are not interesting.  They have flaws ranging from insecurity to obsessive pursuit of given objectives** to anal retentiveness to flightiness to a tendency toward crankiness to occasional “fluffiness.” I am willing to overlook these, as they overlook my various issues.

I am also a sucker for people who write well.*** Staunch insistence on proper grammar and adamant refusal to use “leet speak,” or whatever the abomination so many people use in texting or IM is called, makes my pulse beat a little faster.  I am also captivated by creativity, by the ability to take nothingness — paint, light, metal, ideas — and turn it into art.

Beautiful people know that the world is a complicated place, while understanding that there are things on which compromise is not possible.  They are willing to recognize — and more importantly, admit –when they are wrong.

Note: not politics or social views.  The beautiful people in my life range all along the political spectrum.****  I don’t think all of them are right on everything, but then again, they think I’m dead wrong on some things, too. They like me anyway, as I do them.

Because they have so many of these characteristics, I have a feeling that the beautiful people in my life would enjoy talking to each other.  (Once all of them that are shy got comfortable.)  I keep having fantasies that they could be drawn together in one room.  (Preferably playing “Apples to Apples.”)

I think it would be a simply amazing party.

A beautiful party.

*That would be irony in the true sense, not in the Alanis Morrisette sense.
**See “Clarification.”
***On the purely physical side (because like every one else I occasionally can be shallow that way), I find I have a pronounced weakness for people with blue eyes or a Southern accent, or both.  
****I have to confess that a few people I heretofore had thought of as beautiful became Tea Partiers and birthers in the past few years, and they dropped off the list.  I do not have trouble with conservatism per se — I have some self-identified conservatives on that list — as long as there is a minimum level of intelligent thought behind it.  The birthers and Tea Partiers don’t pass that test.  I still love these people, but I tend to view them with sad bewilderment.

Posted in nothing special | 2 Comments

No. Just no. And don’t call me "sugar," either.

Dear barista:

I am not your “dear.”  I only see you on those rare occasions that your work schedule and my visits to this particular Starbucks (which is neither of my usual ones) coincide. It’s bad enough that you ask for my first name* just for the privilege of getting my overpriced coffee, but this level of familiarity is completely unacceptable.

The only service people who get to call me “dear,” or “hon,” or any other cutesy honorific, are either a) the barista at the Starbucks I do go to most of the time with whom I actually have real conversations occasionally or b) waitresses at greasy spoon diners in the South, preferably if they are older than me, and that simply because it is more or less traditional.

I bet you would be seriously displeased if I called you “sweetie.”

A disgruntled customer.

*And don’t think I have not thought of giving “Ms. Greene” as my name for that.

Posted in My life and times | Leave a comment

What do you mean, this isn’t a federal holiday?

Happy “50% off all chocolate in red heart-shaped boxes” Day.*


*No, this joke is not original to me.  I first heard it years ago on LiveJournal. I’ve never claimed to be all that original.

Posted in nothing special | Leave a comment

I have not watched the Grammys in years. By some odd chance I ended up watching on Sunday night, and it made me regret that I had gotten out of the habit. I ended up listening to the nominees and performers on iTunes, and I picked up some new music. 
Bands such as Mumford & Sons, which I had heard of but had never heard, are now on my laptop. I had already been introduced to Adele, but her performance on the show was incendiary. * There was Dave Grohl, whom I have decided I am in love with, after his speech about music when the Foo Fighters won Best Rock Album for Wasting Light. I had already had some Foo Fighters, but not this one. (“Learn to Fly” pops up on a lot of my playlists, and I am positive “Walk” will, likewise.) 
After checking them out, I am not impressed by Bon Iver. Nicki Minaj’s Exorcist-inspired numbered was simply unfathomable. I may be a simple creature, but I prefer my music unburdened by ridiculous storylines (unless it is a musical). If she was trying to be shocking, she was treading ground well-tilled by Madonna years ago with “Like a Prayer.” I still do not get the attraction of Katy Perry. Jennifer Hudson singing “I Will Always Love You” in tribute to Whitney Houston was moving. 
It was lovely to see that Brian Wilson’s voice is still intact after all these years, even if Mike Love’s isn’t. And while I loved Sir Paul doing the tail end of the song-cycle from Abbey Road** the multiplicity of guitar solos was excessive. While I like the work of each guitarist, giving them what seemed like more time than the rest of the number was altogether too much. I found myself saying “enough already!” 
So now I have new Foo Fighters, and some Mumford & Sons, and am looking to maybe getting some Civil Wars and Lady Antebellum. And the Amy Winehouse/Tony Bennett duet,*** which again I had heard of but not heard. 
 New music is good. Coming out of stagnation is even better. 
* She did as good a job turning a failed relationship into music as Alanis Morissette did with Jagged Little Pill and “You Oughta Know.” 
**I used to sing “Golden Slumbers” to my sons when they were infants. 
*** Carrie Underwood needs to learn not to sing over her partner – especially not one as iconic as Bennett.
Posted in nothing special | Leave a comment

PETA does it again.

I can’t tell whether to be amused or infuriated by PETA’s latest legal manuever:  they have filed a lawsuit in federal court in San Diego claiming that the orcas at Sea World are being held in violation of the 13th Amendment.

That’s right.  PETA is arguing that the whales are slaves.  Because, after all, the law doesn’t actually state that the Constitution is restricted to one species. “It’s a new frontier in civil rights,”Jeff Kerr, PETA’s general counsel, was quoted as saying,  “Slavery does not depend on the species of the slave any more than it depends on race, gender or ethnicity.”

To equate the fate of present day amusement park animals with the plight of millions of enslaved African Americans in the antebellum South is the sort of bizarre thinking that can only come from the people arguing that slaughtering animals for meat is the equivalent of the Nazi Holocaust.  It is — or would be — laughable, except that this stupid case will eat up court time, energy and resources that could be better spent on other things.

While I have no sympathy in particular for Sea World, I do feel rather sorry for the District Judge, Jeffrey Miller.  I am looking forward to seeing his ruling on this.  Personally, I think he should decide simply that PETA* doesn’t have standing to sue here, but that’s mainly because I think it would mess with people’s heads.

Undoubtedly, whatever he decides will get appealed.

And perhaps PETA has a point: if a corporation can be a person, why not a cetacean?

*Or any other humans — only the whales.

Posted in Politics, Science, Social Issues | Leave a comment

Not to mention attracting wildlife.

Red Headed Menace: It was a really interesting exhibit on water usage. Did you know some large percentage of water in this county goes for landscaping? When people could set up systems using captured rains…
Me: Wait, what??!?!?!
RHM: What’s wrong?
Me: Oh, wait. I thought you said “brains.”
RHM: That would work too, but it would be far less efficient.

Posted in nothing special | Leave a comment

What is so very very wrong with this picture?

Chris Brown performed at the Grammys tonight.  The local newscast reported that it was the first time he had been at the Grammys since he dropped out of the 2009 show.

Funny.  They did not mention why he had dropped out.

Chris Brown dropped out because he brutally beat his girlfriend, Rihanna.  Somehow, that doesn’t seem to matter anymore.   What sort of message does that send to every victim of abuse in this country?

Sasha Pasulka at HelloGiggles answers that question.

Posted in nothing special | Leave a comment

Pretty and beautiful.

Taylor Swift is pretty.  Very pretty.  Very pretty in a traditional Hollywood way.  And she sings very well.  She is fresh, and pretty, and her music — the admittedly small amount I’ve heard of it — is full of energy.

I like her work.

Adele is beautiful.  Stunningly beautiful.  She is not merely pretty.  She has presence. She does not look like all the other pretty singers out there. Her music is powerful.

I adore her work.

I don’t know how else to explain the difference between the two concepts.

Posted in Social Issues | Leave a comment

Hey, want to impress your loved ones — or your loved one’s coworkers — this Valentine’s Day? Don’t buy chocolate truffles, make them.  This Martha Stewart recipe is a good starting point.*  (There are more difficult recipes out there — most involve butter.  I like this one because it is, as Alton Brown might say, so gosh-darned easy.) You can adapt it quite nicely by using flavored chocolate, as long as it does not have lumps in it; Cost Plus sells some tasty chipotle chocolate.  And, if you are good at this sort of thing, you can carefully melt some chocolate and dip the truffles in them and coat them with things like very finely chopped crystallized ginger instead of the traditional cocoa.  It scales up and down, as well: the basic recipe is one ounce of heavy cream to two ounces of chocolate, although it is difficult with larger amounts to know exactly how long to let the mixture sit. You can get nice decorative boxes from party stores or craft stores.

So, am I doing this for Valentine’s Day? Of course not.  The Rocket Scientist is.

*Let the truffle mixture cool until it is just spreadable, and it makes a wonderful, if rather stiff, icing for chocolate cake.  The Rocket Scientist’s favorite cake from me is a dark chocolate cake, with truffle icing made from chocolate with 72% cocoa. The kids don’t like it because it isn’t sweet enough.  The Rocket Scientist once said it was “a cake for consenting adults.”

Posted in nothing special | Leave a comment

At some point, did they stop teaching civics in schools?

So, Rick Santorum wants to overturn any decision the Supreme Court makes declaring bans on same-sex marriage unconstitutional.

Mr. Santorum, you can’t do that.  The Supreme Court gets to decide what’s constitutional, you do not.  Now, you can drag your feet and nitpick and try to get similar bans through by narrowing the scope of the ban, but that is a different matter.  Those tactics have a long and dishonorable history, reaching back to Andrew Jackson and his role in Indian removal from tribal lands in the South to foot dragging by the Eisenhower and Kennedy administration regarding segregation to the Bush and Obama regimes’ fight over the fate of Guantanamo detainees.

It is quite disturbing that you — and so many others — have this bizarre idea that the Constitution, specifically the Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment, has anything to do with supporting “the will of the people.”  The will of the people is frequently dead wrong, not to mention dangerous: “the people” have been in favor of, among other things, slavery (in the South), segregation (supported more widely than just in the South), and against not only allowing same-sex marriage but interracial marriage .

No, the Bill of Rights does not exist to protect the majority from “judicial tyranny,” but to protect the minority from the tyranny of majority opinion.  That so many people misunderstand this simple fact makes me wonder when we stopped teaching about the Constitution in school.

And it does not help that the writer in this case also does not understand the way the Court works.  In non-constitutional matters, Congress can legislatively overturn a Supreme Court decision.  The first bill signed by President Obama upon taking office was the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, which specifically corrected the Supreme Court decision in Ledbetter v. Goodyear. The President can push Congress in those cases.

And this idea of a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage? It might be successful.  I have lost a lot of faith in my fellow citizens. More than that, I have lost much faith in both Congress and state legislatures to follow the actual will of the people.  According to a 2011 Pew Research Center poll, 46% of Americans support ending bans on same-sex marriage, more than the 44% who favor continuing them. Given the margin of error was 2.5 %, that amounts to a dead heat. However, both the national and state legislatures have shown themselves willing to kowtow to pressure from smaller but very vocal interest groups.

But more to the point, why is this such an issue with you? Contrary to what you and your fellow fundamentalists claim, gays being allowed to marry will have not one bit of significance to your own heterosexual marriage, or those of others. At its heart, this an attempt to force the rest of us to submit to your religious convictions. Which really is against the Constitution, namely the First Amendment.

And if what you say is true, if same-sex marriage really does imperil the sanctity of your own, then your marriage is a weak and easily broken reed.  If that is the case, you had no business getting married in the first place.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

What’s next? Chutes and Ladders? Twister?

During the Superbowl, NBC showed an ad for the upcoming Battleship movie.  This led to a discussion in my Facebook* about what board game might next be adapted for the screen.  I was proud of my suggestion of “Candyland,” deeming it too ridiculous for contemplation.


Guess what? Yep.  I couldn’t believe it either. Although if a studio is going to adapt such a stupid idea for a movie, it is only fitting that it star Adam Sandler.  It had to be either him or Rob Schieder.

Good Lord, people.  I was only joking.

Oh, and as even more proof that there are people in Hollywood with less imagination than your average mainframe, at one point Universal was going to make “Ouija.”  A friend of mine once suggested “Pong: The Movie,” and maybe that would be the natural next step — backwards.

These movies are product placement taken to their (il)logical extremes.** If that’s the case, I would much rather see a full-length movie starring the Coca-Cola polar bears.

*The best use of Facebook, by far, is to liveblog events that you are stuck watching by yourself.  (Nobody in my family likes watching football.)  Thanks to FB, I spent the entire Super Bowl chatting with friends in such disparate places as New Jersey, Sacramento, and San Jose.  It was a blast — and I intend to do the same thing for the Oscars.  I cordially invite any of my FB friends to join me!
**Actually, the Caveman series a few years ago, starring the Neanderthals from the GEICO commercials, ranks right up there.

Posted in Culture (popular and otherwise) | Tagged | Leave a comment

Knock-Knock. Who’s there? Go away.

Yesterday, I spent the day running around looking for items for a party we were throwing at the house for the Resident Shrink’s birthday, and driving to Casa da Fruta to get the specific type of glazed apricots covered in chocolate she likes, and calling game stores and book stores and Judaica stores in a futile attempt to locate “Apples to Apples, the Jewish Edition.” (She ended up getting an Amazon.com printout of the game, due to arrive Tuesday.)  The day before I had spent trying to get a VGA cable and VGA-Thunderbolt adapter.* Oh, and going to the Giradhelli factory outlet*** store in San Leandro to get all the chocolate I lost in betting the Resident Shrink’s mother on the outcome of the National Conference Championship. (Had the Niners won, I would have gotten Real New York Bagels. Rats.) And my regular Thursday afternoon group.

Last night was the party at our house.  I was actually social for a whole three hours! I am not a party person.  Although I can spend hours on end with people I like and know well, three hours at a party was a stretch, since I was not engaged in a joint project or game.**** (Give me a game — almost any game — and I will hang out with even total strangers forever.)

Today was spent in appraiser training for Destination Imagination, a wonderful program for schoolkids that pushes them to exercise creativity and judgment in solving challenges.  One of the best parts is that no one outside the team — including parents — can help them.  At all.  Which from a parental standpoint takes a lot of pressure off, only to be replaced with the stress of having to bite your tongue to not say “That thing is never going to fly.” Four years ago, when the Red-Headed Menace was in DI,  I volunteered to be an appraiser and chose to be the Timekeeper/Announcer. I have been doing it every year since, even after I ceased to have a kid involved in the program.  Being TKA allows me to indulge the frustrated actor in me, and means I don’t actually have to judge anyone. I hang out with the kids beforehand for a few minutes, which is fun, and then present them to the audience.  (I always do the improv challenge.  It is amazing what really bright elementary and middle school kids can come up with in five minutes, given a relatively small amount of information.)

I have been cheerful and charming throughout.  But after all that, I think this t-shirt is very much in order.

*Note to self, before I forget it: You still need to hunt down the HDMI-Thunderbolt adaptor. Try Fry’s.** Or the Apple store.
**For those out of the SF Bay Area, Fry’s is Geek Nirvana.  Sort of like Radio Shack, only much much bigger and with more annoying commercials. Each store (at least of the original several — I don’t know if it is still true) has a different “theme.” I shop at the “Old West” store in Palo Alto — I seem to recall that the one in Campbell has a “Babylonian” Theme.
***I am still trying to wrap my head around the idea of a chocolate company having an outlet store.  And it’s just down the road from the Entemann’s Bakery outlet store, which just isn’t fair.
 ****Oddly enough, I am fine in a workplace situation, even a work-related social situation such as a coworker’s birthday party, perhaps because in those situations there is something to talk about.

Posted in nothing special | Leave a comment

Mother God

In her blog, Rachel Held Evans reports on a call by John Piper, evangelical pastor, to preserve “masculine Christianity.”

God has given Christianity a masculine feel. And being God, a God of love, He has done that for our maximum flourishing both male and female… He does not intend for women to languish or be frustrated or in any way suffer or fall short of full and lasting joy in this masculine Christianity. From which I infer that the fullest flourishing of women and men takes place in churches and families that have this masculine feel.

Evans calls upon men to answer this, rightly pointing out than women’s responses to misogyny tend to be dismissed as the “rants of ‘angry feminists’.”  She also invites women to participate, of course — speaking out against one’s own marginalization is always a good thing.

So, Reverend Piper, all I have to say, in the words of the Psalmist, is

Lord, my heart is not lifted up,
   my eyes are not raised too high;
I do not occupy myself with things
   too great and too marvelous for me.
But I have calmed and quieted my soul,
   like a weaned child with its mother;
   my soul is like the weaned child that is with me.


O Israel, hope in the Lord
   from this time on and for evermore.

Psalm 131 (New Revised Standard Version)

Image of God as mother.  Or is that not too direct for you?*

*Piper would not be the only pastor to have problem with this psalm.  I was once having a discussion about feminist theology with a clergyman of my acquaintance, and he claimed that there were no feminine images of God in the Bible.  I recited this psalm (my favorite, along with 121) to him, and his first question was “what translation are you using?” When I replied “the New Revised Standard,” he insisted on seeing it. That was not too difficult, as copies of the NRSV were in back of every seat in the church.

Posted in God faith and theology | 2 Comments

Visioning music.

There is no day so bad that Aaron Copeland’s “Appalachian Spring” will not make it better.

I close my eyes, and I am back east, in the Smokies.  I can see the light leaves on the maples and birches budding out stark against the deep green of the pines and firs.  There are dogwoods, too, just beginning to leaf and already in bud.  They will burst out blooming, soon, their pale pink and white flowers presaging the blossoming of the grander wild azaleas and magnolias.

There is Greenbrier, with the barn, and the deer in the mist rising from the meadow in the early evening. And the narrow road we drove down with trees curving overhead like a canopy, where we startled the black bear.  It was a tossup as to who was more frightened; he must have been — he left first.

There are the trails, forking like Robert Frost’s in “The Road Not Taken.”  Each heading its own way, but unlike Frost’s, with hope of turning and returning, with the prospect of another trail diverging and another adventure just over the ridge.

I can almost smell the clean air and feel the exhilaration of springtime.  Normally, spring is not my favorite season, since summer — that dreadful time of year — follows so close upon its heels.  Especially in Georgia, where I lived after college, and where spring lasts all of about two weeks before the heat settles in like an omnipresent oppressive cloud. Summer in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park is crowded, with the clean air overcome by automobile exhaust.

I am an ocean person, deep down to my core, not a mountain person, but the Smokies in springtime are glorious.  It has been far too many years since I have been there, but “Appalachian Spring” makes me remember what they are like.

That can make any day a little better.

Posted in Culture (popular and otherwise), Music | Leave a comment