One of those days.

What’s worse, I had already gone to the Starbucks which is our pre-shift meeting place, to get some writing done.  I will be stuck here for hours, unable to work. I will also have to explain to my boss why I can’t work, which I hate doing. (Hopefully, it won’t look like I am crying by the time he gets here.)

I should have known this was going to happen. Last night, a perfect stranger asked with some concern why I was shaking so badly.  I had to explain that  it was more or less normal, simply a benign tremor exacerbated by medication. (I suppose I could have snarled “mind your own business,” but the man looked on the verge of calling for medical help. He was honestly trying to be caring towards a fellow human being, which I applaud.)

Posted in Health, My life and times | Tagged | Leave a comment

Vaccine idiocy: it’s a first world problem, unfortunately.

I can tell the measles epidemic has hit the big time: politicians are weighing in on the issue of vaccination.

Rand Paul says that parents should be able to choose, and that he knows many cases of children who have suffered irreversible damage after they were vaccinated. (Even if you accept him at face value, which I don’t given his libertarian base, correlation does not automatically equal causation.  For many children the onset of symptoms of autism happen at about the same time as vaccination.) Chris Christie said that parents should have a choice, and then backtracked when hit with backlash from rational parents.

Jack Wolfson, a doctor who opposes vaccination, says getting measles is not that big a deal.  He also points out that only a few people have come down with the disease, and nobody has died. He has also said he would have no problem if someone else got measles from his kids and died. Wolfson claims it is the responsibliity of those who cannot be vaccinated to stay out of society, not those who choose not to be vaccinated. He went so far as to call a mother who vaccinated her kids “a bad mother” for “injecting her kids with chemicals.” He asks “Where are all the 80-year-old polio cases? I don’t see many.” Of course not, since polio has been eradicated in all but three countries because of vaccines. (It is worth noting that he is a cardiologist, not an epidemiologist.)

Wolfson is a narcissistic, selfish son of a bitch.

He is also clearly young: too young to remember when polio was a threat every child and parent feared, when measles was a serious disease that could maim, blind and kill, when rubella resulted in severe birth defects, stillbirth, and newborn deaths. He should talk to people older than himself about so-called childhood diseases.  I was lucky: my mother got rubella late in pregnancy, not in the first trimester.  I was born six weeks early, but without birth defects.  She has told me about being too sick to hold me. (I could not get the MMR when it was developed because I was allergic to eggs, with which the vaccine was made. I only recently got the shot to cover me against measles. I got rubella (and chickenpox) when I was a toddler, and I was very, very sick indeed. I have had dental problems all my life, in part caused by the very high fevers I ran when I my teeth were forming.)

Nobody should have come down with measles. The “Disneyland epidemic” should never have happened: in 2000, measles was considered eradicated in the United States.* Then the anti-vaccination craze took hold. And now measles is back.

I can only imagine what people in the rest of the world think about us.  Measles kills about one person an hour throughout the world, according to the World Health Organization. It is the leading cause of blindness in children in the developing world. The very fact that there are people in our country who choose not to vaccinate against this potentially life-threatening disease, all the while knowing that (until recently) their child would probably not get the disease is mind-boggling.

It is a first-world problem, and it is an obscenity, a slap in the face to every child (or adult) who died in an  area where vaccinations are not carried out.

God help us all: may the particularly American idiocy which places the preferences of the individual over the good of the society be overcome in this case, and “personal choice” or religious exemptions be banned throughout the country.** Otherwise, it is only a matter of time before we see deaths — preventable deaths — among the unvaccinated or immunocompromised.

*I never thought I would feel sorry for Disney, about as monolithic (and litigious) a corporation as you can get, but they didn’t deserve all this bad publicity.

**Mississippi is last in a lot of things, and people make jokes about the state, but it does not allow any exceptions to vaccination requirements other than medical ones, and as a result has the highest MMR vaccination rate in the country.

Posted in Social Issues | Tagged | Leave a comment

Restructuring, not reform.

“Pension reform.”

The words have been floating around the national zeitgeist for several years now.  Politicians such as Scott Walker (or, more closer to my home, former San Jose mayor Chuck Reed) have fanned the flames of public angst  over city, county, and state finances and mistrust of collective bargaining into distrust and anger towards civil servants and government employee unions.Teachers, cops, and firefighters are targeted the most. (In some ways, people feel about teachers and other government employees the way they feel about Congress: they hate them collectively (i.e., their unions), but like their Congressman or the teachers at their schools.)

San Jose voters passed Measure B in 2012, making major cuts to pensions and disability benefits for police and firefighters.  Most of the measure was tossed out by a court (the city is appealing the decision).  The public rhetoric has gotten so nasty, you could not pay me enough to be a cop or firefighter in San JoseAnd, in fact, since the passage of Measure B, and the war on cops’ benefits and pensions began, San Jose has been hemorrhaging police officers at an alarming rate.

Chuck Reed then tried to place an initiative on the 2014 California ballot which would have allowed municipalities to change already vested public pension plans, but withdrew it when the Secretary of State’s analysis of the initiative stated that the proposed constitutional amendment would eliminate certain protections for public employees, including firefighters, police, nurses, and teachers.  Among other things, Reed felt that including those professions would have prejudiced voters against the measure, even though those were the half of the public employees the measure targeted.

To listen to some news sources, the entire reason American cities are in financial trouble is because cops and firefighters are greedy bastards, or, at the very least, stooges for rapacious unions. People seem to forget or ignore that a lot of the financial problems that hit cities coincided with the economic meltdown — local governments’ investments were badly hurt like everyone else’s, not to mention tax revenues.  The meltdown provided anti-union politicians with the perfect cover to undercut police, fire, and teacher pensions and benefits. Libraries and services to the poor were being cut and it was colored as being all the fault of those greedy cops.

And so the fight for “pension reform” was joined. Ignoring the fact that pensions are in fact deferred compensation, and destroying them is effectively refusing to pay workers what they were promised after they have already started doing the work, many politicians and voters still viewed them as fair game. Candidates for public office were asked if they were for or against “pension reform.” Liberal candidates often countered that they wanted to do pension reform by working with police and fire unions to find solutions, only to be labeled as “anti-reform.”

I will state right now that we progressives made a major mistake. Every time we engaged on the topic of “pension reform” without reframing it, we ceded important moral and rhetorical ground we should have held on to. Before even addressing the “how,” we needed to have changed the “what.”

Reform is a loaded word. It implies bad faith at best, or graft at worst: one reforms corrupt governments, or religious organizations. On the other hand, one does not “reform” bankrupt businesses, one “restructures” them.

Are there cases where cities are in trouble and changes in compensation need to be made? Absolutely.  But that does not mean that the original agreements were graft-driven gifts to greedy public servants.  It means that, like any other entity in financial straits, a city must negotiate with its creditors — in this case cops and firefighters — to reach an equitable solution.

Any time any progressive engages in talking about “pension reform” without immediately cutting off discussion to say “what we need to be talking about is pension restructuring,” they’ve already surrendered half the field. Our hardworking public servants deserve better than that. They may end up losing compensation, but the very least we can do is not buy into the implication that they’re avaricious.

As far as I go, though, I think that  if you are willing to risk a bullet, or run into a burning building, or have to deal with the aftermath of terrible car accidents and gruesome suicides, you should have whatever pension you want.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Today’s rant.

[This has been reposted from Facebook: FB friends, you can skip this.  Of course, you can skip anything I write, but in this case you won’t miss anything.)

Here’s the deal:

The First Amendment protects EVERYONE. Christians, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Wiccans, disciples of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, worshippers of many gods or none. A hijab or a burqa or a yarmulke is an expression of a religion, the same way that a cross is, or the dresses Mennonite women wear. You may not like the religion or what it stands for or how it treats women but you don’t get to determine what are “acceptable” expressions of faith. 

Article VI of the Constitution of the United States specifically prohibits religious tests as a condition of public office. ANY public office. So, no, we do NOT need to only elect Christians as legislators or senators or president or even dogcatcher. And any person who thinks that the founding fathers were only concerned with favoring one brand of Christianity over another knows nothing about history. We were not specifically founded as a Christian country. Me? I will vote for whichever candidate stands for taking care of ordinary people, and social justice, regardless of religious affiliation. (Also, “by their works shall you know them.” Christians who are highly critical of Pope Francis’s call for taking care of the poor might well reread their New Testament in its entirety, not merely whatever snippets are read aloud in church on Sunday.)

Contrary to what one might think by watching the news, we are NOT a monolithic culture. The culture of California is different from the culture of Mississippi which is different from the culture of Massachusetts. Hell, the culture of San Francisco is different from the culture of L.A. In the long run, we are made RICHER by diversity, and acceptance of that diversity, than by demanding that everyone conform to white middle-class standards of dress and behavior.

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Space tragedy week.

I did not have a chance yesterday to write a new post for the Challenger disaster anniversary.  Today is the anniversary of the Apollo 1 fire, and February 1 is Columbia.

I thought I would link to some of the posts I have written in the past about these events, and about space generally.

Mission 51-L and Challenger.

“Gold and Darkness” and “To Inspire and Guide.”

“We do this not because it is easy…”

Posted in Science, The World | Tagged | Leave a comment

A white woman looks at Selma. For what it’s worth.

[Yes, there are one or two spoilers for Selma in this post. Also, before you comment, please read the entire post.]

Last week a friend and I went to see Selma. She grew up in the South, as I did, and wanted to watch the movie with someone who had a similar cultural background.

I am not going to review the movie: the critics are dead on point when they name Selma one of the best pictures of the year.  It is certainly one of the most important pictures of the past several years. The acting and directing were superb, the cinematography at times breathtaking.  The willingness to look at King in context, as part of a movement, rather than engaging in hagiography, impressed me. (Let me say right now that John Lewis is and has been for many years one of my heroes.) No, I will examine the movie from the perspective of a privileged white woman who, had she been born earlier, might well have been friends with the thugs wielding baseball bats.

I am not sure that what a white woman has to say about the civil rights movement is at all important.  It is not my struggle, and part of being a good ally is shutting the hell up and recognizing that the narrative is not about you. I am haunted though, not by guilt per se, but by sadness, and inherited responsibility.

My background, a Southerner from a long line of Southerners, carries a lot of baggage: older relatives who referred to “n******,” who believed in the myths of the welfare queen and that all black men were dangerous. Older relatives who thought that the reason African-Americans have not progressed further economically is that they are lazy and shiftless, and others who think that niceties such as the Voting Rights Act are superfluous.

I don’t share any of those attitudes (or at least not consciously — overcoming your background can be a difficult thing), but I do share a love for the places I think of as my heritage. Most people do not think of Florida as being part of the South, but it is.  Not for everyone, perhaps: I have a lot of friends who grew up in a Florida that was an extension of the Midwest, populated with émigrés from Ohio and Michigan.

Mine was a different Florida.  My mother’s family lived in Florida before Florida became a state. My ancestors also reached into Georgia and Alabama: prior to the Civil War, one of my great-great-great-grandfathers on my mother’s side had one of the largest slaveholdings in Greene County, Georgia. My father’s family had its roots in Georgia and Alabama.

I love Florida, but not simply the sandy beaches that draw the snowbirds and tourists.  I love the sleepy little towns in the interior, towns where my forbears lay buried in cemeteries that have not seen anyone interred in a century. The beauty of that flat geography (flatter than a pancake, flatter than Kansas, even) with sandy soil and dotted with live oaks hung with Spanish moss makes me happy. Central Florida (at least that part not owned and overrun by Disney or Universal) is as much a part of Dixie as Alabama. I love the dusty red clay of Georgia, where my husband grew up, and the rolling pine forests of Mississippi, where my siblings live. I understand that even as they share a heritage of slavery and oppression, each region of the South has its own character.  Southern Georgia is different from northern Mississippi, different from the mountains of North Carolina. Louisiana, especially southern Louisiana, is like no other place on earth.

My father and mother broke away from their cultural influences, my father from serving in World War II and my mother from being a nurse in inner-city Atlanta. Even though my siblings and I were brought up in the South in the sixties (not far removed from the time portrayed in Selma) we were taught quite early that all people were equal in the sight of God and the law: that being white did not and should not make us better than others.  While I am not sure they understood the complexities of white privilege, my parents at least repudiated the outright racism that would have been their birthright.

My father once stormed out of a Baptist church during a sermon on the evils of the Jews, never to return.  He had served with, and become friends with, Jewish soldiers in the Pacific (many of whom had died), and he admired their bravery and sacrifice.  That a bigoted preacher would dare besmirch their memory infuriated him. He converted to Catholicism shortly thereafter. Being Catholic in the Bible Belt caused him to make choices: he once turned down a chance to take over an insurance agency in a small town in Mississippi because he was not Baptist and would not be able to attend church with others in the community, which would have lost him a substantial amount of business. Catholics in that part of Mississippi were seen as not quite Christian. Instead, we moved to New Orleans, which was largely Catholic, and later to Jackson, which was more diverse.

Watching Selma was painful.  The inner voice that screamed “not all white Southerners!” had to be continually suppressed.  Not all white Southerners, perhaps, but enough, more than enough. (That I had to remember that the issue was “not all white Southerners!” rather than “not all Southerners!” is telling, and shows how far I have to go in letting go of my own baggage.) I grew up with people who were welcoming and hospitable.  Of course they were welcoming and hospitable to me: I was a white girl, I was kin. Many of the Southerners I grew up with were good, generous, caring people, as far as I could tell. Being faced with the truth of the brutality faced by people — especially African Americans — working for civil rights at the hands of whites stung.

It was not as though I had not known about the civil-rights movement in the South; I had. I took  history classes about America in the 1960s. I had watched Eyes on the Prize, and the PBS documentaries on the Freedom Riders and the March on Washington.  All that grainy black-and-white footage seemed so distant.  Even listening to the reminiscences of surviving participants seemed… distant, historical. (I recognize that it is an element of white privilege that allows it to feel distant.)  Selma made the horror feel real, visceral, in the same way that the opening of Saving Private Ryan made the sacrifices of the soldiers on the beaches of Normandy visceral.

Assessing the responsibility of white Southerners for the horrors of Jim Crow runs into much the same problems as in doing the same for gentiles in Nazi Germany.  The hierarchy of culpability has many rungs. There were the thugs, who felt it was perfectly acceptable to beat people to death with baseball bats and boots, and their accomplices who sheltered them and cheered them on.  There were those who felt that violence was excessive and unacceptable, but also that certainly “those people” were not equal to whites, and should never be allowed to vote or exercise power because they just were not capable of responsibility. There were heroes, who spoke out at risk to their community standing, their careers, and in extreme cases, their lives.

Then there were (and are) the cowardly masses: those who felt that blacks were being mistreated and oppressed, but who kept silent. Part of the silence was fear of social consequences, which could be considerable in a small town; part of it may have been fear of physical retaliation. (Selma addresses this, too: a young clergyman who came down from Boston to join the march was beaten to death.  More shocking, the closing scenes (where the fates of characters are revealed) shows Viola Luizza, a mother from Michigan who had theretofore been anonymous, and relates that she was killed by Klansman (one of whom was an FBI informant) while ferrying another marcher back to Selma from Montgomery.) Coming from the North to support marchers was dangerous enough, but Southerners had to go on living with the danger after people from New York and other places far away had returned home.

If I am brutally honest with myself, I recognize that I would have been part of this group. When I was younger, I too was reluctant to challenge the racist jokes and statements told in my presence by older people. (Young Southerners were taught to respect their elders whatever the circumstances.  That is still no excuse.) There are one or two incidences from my youth which cause me to wince in shame if I remember them.

I have changed as I have grown older; at least, I hope I have.  I grew stronger, and less tolerant of bigotry. I speak out now.  I teach my children to speak out.  Living in California poses a different set of challenges; however, speaking out for Latinos here is as important as speaking out for African-Americans in the South. Speaking out for Jews or for people of Middle Eastern descent is important anywhere in America.

Recognizing and owning my white privilege matters.

I worry that outspokenness is not because I am more courageous, but because I do not face consequences. I am not going to be beaten if I interrupt an anti-LGBT tirade. My house is not going to be vandalized (or torched) if I defend a woman’s right to wear a hijab if she chooses, or if I meet an anti-Semitic joke with a stony glare.

Some of the white Southerners in Selma of  speak of “liberal guilt.” You can hear sneering echoes of those words today on talk radio and Fox News. Perhaps I am guilty, but it is for my silence; a sin of omission rather than commission..  More than guilt, though, I have the responsibility to recognize that I benefitted from the Jim Crow society portrayed in Selma, simply by virtue of the color of my skin. I have the responsibility to help change America, because I have been protected by the institutionalized racism that shields me from indignities because I am white.

Selma reminded me of that.

Posted in Culture (popular and otherwise), Justice | Tagged | 2 Comments

Pop culture games.

I have been playing a couple of pop culture games in my head lately, and would like to have other people play along.

1: How different can they be?

I have been thinking about directors and the disparate movies they have made.  So, the question arose, what two movies fall the farthest apart from each other?

The initial case was Alfonso Cuaron, who prior to directing Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban directed Y Tu Mama Tambien (an excellent, excellent, film, although it should have been rated NC-17) I saw the latter when it came out, and when I heard that Cuaron would helm the third Harry Potter movie, I said out loud “What. The. Hell?!?!?!?” (That said, I think HP:TPA is far and away the best movie of the Harry Potter films, with only Deathly Hallows Part II coming close.)

Don’t get me wrong — directing movies very different from each other is a gift. You cannot pigeonhole a Cuaron movie going in, the same way you can Christopher Nolan, say, although Memento and The Dark Knight I suppose would qualify as being diverse. (Or Wes Anderson. “Quirky” only goes so far in my book.) Nor does having movies that are similar in tone mean that the director is not wonderful: Bergman and Kurasowa clearly fall within the “genius” category.

But even directors with a distinct style can have very different movies. Hitchcock’s Psycho is a much different movie than Fun With Dick and Jane. The intense and claustrophobic Rope (my favorite Hitchcock) is different from the frothy To Catch a Thief.

So, what directors and movies would you “nominate”?

2. Unintended trilogies.

“Unintended trilogies” are groups of books which make sense alongside each other in the bookcase, even though written by different authors and nominally about different subjects.

My mind started down this path by noticing that Devil In the White City, Empire of Sin, and Tinseltown all had similar covers: black with white or off-white lettering, with a lurid title or subtitle. Of course! They are my “cities and the evils they can hold” trilogy. (I suppose you could add Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil if you really stretched things.)

And almost all schoolchildren have read the eighteenth-nineteenth century British female writers trilogy: Pride and Prejudice, Jane Eyre, and Wuthering Heights. (So the Brontës were sisters. Still counts.) Although, thinking about it, Sense and Sensibility makes a better companion to the other books than Pride and Prejudice. Or if the Brontes being sisters bothers you, and you are willing to go to male writers, you could swap out Great Expectations for Jane Eyre.

I realize that for this to make sense, there have to be more rules, other than that which I can think of right now. I also realize that for many people this is not a game, but simply how they arrange their bookshelves. (In my house, depending upon the bookcase, it is either sort of alphabetically or more or less randomly, being roughly divided into history, fiction, other non-fiction, etc…)

Of course you can do this about movies, too: my “nerds are great!” triple feature from 2014 would be The Imitation Game, The Theory of Everything, and Big Hero 6.

I’m not sure that my examples are all that imaginative, and would love to hear better ones.

Posted in Culture (popular and otherwise) | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Things seem at times overwhelming right now.  I have not been writing about them, though.  I wrote a piece on Charlie Hebdo which I haven’t published — it’s kind of late to do so now.  Many people said what I was going to say — and said it better.  The exercise of writing it was useful, however.

As always, I resolved this  New Year’s to write more. January is almost up, and I am far from doing so. (I also resolved to use the passive voice less often.  We’ll see how that goes.)

On the good side, I have work again, starting tomorrow.  Part-time as always (and involving a lot more walking), and once again I cannot talk about it.  We operate under what my boss calls “the Vegas rule,” — what happens at work, stays at work. He’s paranoid, but has come by his paranoia honestly. As the cliche goes, just because you are paranoid does not mean that they are not all out to get you.

The sun is setting beautifully outside.  The day has been warm, but once again we have been subject to a “spare the air” alert. There have been so many recently lately.  I wish it would rain, and soon, and a lot.  It seems odd to wish for rain when not too many years ago I was bemoaning an El Nino winter with storm after storm. You could call me fickle, I suppose.

I’ve been reading a lot (in actual books! made of paper and everything!) since Christmas. I read Snuff and Moving Pictures by Terry Pratchett, and Empire of Sin by Gary Krist, which I then reread to get all of the nuances. It weaves a wonderful story of sin and the fight against it, which had worse consequences in many ways than what it purported to cure. Well worth reading. I also read The Monuments Men by Robert Edsel, the true book on which the flop by George Clooney was based.  (I may have been one of the two people in the country who actually liked the movie.) A book with art conservators and historians as heroes falls right into my wheelhouse.  I plan to read his companion book, Saving Italy, about the Monuments Men at work in Italy during the war, soon, as well as the other major book about Nazi art looting that I have heard about, The Rape of Europa by Lynn Nicholas.  I loved the documentary based on this book as well, but then so did most other people who saw it. Those books will have to wait, though: my current project (I’m on page ten) is Tinseltown: Murder, Morphine and Madness at the Dawn of Hollywood by William J. Mann.  (I have been desperately looking for my copy of The Forger’s Spell: A True Story of Vermeer, Nazis, and the Greatest Art Hoax of the Twentieth Century by Edward Dolnick. I used to own it, but cannot find it anywhere.  I suppose I may have loaned it to someone, the same way that I loaned my copy of Mary Doria Russell’s The Sparrow, but I can’t remember to whom.)

I lost books during the flood. The waters did not reach the bookcases, but books had fallen under my bed.  I had read all of them, and though they were good, the only one I intend to replace is Pratchett’s Thief of Time, and simply because it is my second favorite Discworld book, and I reread it from time to time.

Fewer books means more space, right?

Posted in Books, My life and times, Work! | Leave a comment

Just a thought….

I hope to do a full review of it in another post, but I do think that every person who is of voting age and who did not vote in either of the last two elections should be dragged to a movie theater — forcibly, if necessary — to see Selma.  To see people dying for the right to vote.  And everyone who says “my vote doesn’t matter,” they should pay close attention to the career of the brutal sheriff after the Voting Rights Act went into effect.

Posted in Culture (popular and otherwise) | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The best lines from tonight’s State of the Union address:

“I don’t have any more campaigns to run. I know, because I won both of them.”

And…

“I have two words for any member of Congress who truly thinks you can live on less than $15,000 a year: try it.”

Overall, a good speech domestically, a rose-colored mess on foreign policy.

[edited to correct quotes — I had been working from memory.]

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Movie reviews.

In the past week I have seen three different movies, with three different experiences.

The first was Mr. Turner, the biopic about the painter J.M.W. Turner.  Even before the movie began, I knew I was in for a comfortable time.  The local multiplex had several of their smaller theater converted to reserved seating.  For the same amount of money, I got to sit in a very comfortable recliner.  It was like sitting at home watching a movie on HBO, except with a huge screen and expensive snacks.

I loved Mr. Turner. That said, I love art, I love Turner’s work, and I recognized many of the works on the walls.  Even as I watched it, I realized that Timothy Spall’s amazing performance notwithstanding,  if all those things were not true I would have been bored out of my skull. The Rocket Scientist fell asleep for ten minutes. Nonetheless, it was a good movie.

I wish I could have said the same for The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies, which was was bloated and quite boring at places. Had  Peter Jackson condensed his trilogy into his two movies and edited them heavily, he would have two very nice films each with a two-hour running time. Furthermore, several moments totally over came my willingness or even ability to suspend disbelief. Elves may be magical, but unless they can fly, Legolas being able to leap up falling rocks is simply ridiculous.  That said, I enjoyed the use of non-equine battle steeds: the pigs, rams and especially the giant caribou were quite imaginative. Also, Kili makes my heart flutter, much like Tauriel’s. I don’t like long hair on men, but in his case, I’ll make an exception. Knowing what happens to him (I read the book, after all) didn’t change that.

I also learned that the best time to see movies is late weekday evenings. The Resident Shrink, Rocket Scientist, and I went to a late 3D Imax  showing. We were the only people in the theater, which meant we could talk (and snicker) through all the previews.

The same thing happened when I went to see Into the Woods.  I had been eagerly waiting to see this movie ever since I heard about it. Events in my life had precluded seeing it earlier, but I did finally get to it before it  left theaters.  I went to the late show on a Wednesday evening, and I was the only person in the theater.  Given that I was by myself, I used the opportunity to sing along with some of the numbers.

I loved Into the Woods. Meryl Streep embodied the witch totally. (She’s clearly ageless: her “beautiful witch” looked to be about forty.) Chris Pine and Anna Kendrick were perfect as Cinderella and her Prince. (Sondheim once stated that he preferred hiring actors and teaching them to sing than hiring singers and trying to teach them to act.  He and Rob Marshall clearly took that tack here.)

Emily Blunt was magnificent as the Baker’s Wife.  The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Scientists snub of her in their Oscar nominations annoyed me as almost but not quite as the snubs directed towards Selma‘s director, Ava DuVernay, and lead actor, David Oyelewo.

I am scheduled to go see Selma next week, and am looking forward to it.

 

Posted in Culture (popular and otherwise) | Tagged | Leave a comment

When staffers at IMDb get bored.

Posted in Culture (popular and otherwise) | Leave a comment

Dear Universe: you can stop now. Really.

“God gives you nothing you can’t handle.”  Far too many people, including my late mother.

In the last twelve months, my family has endured (in order of importance):

  • The death of my mother and the Rocket Scientist’s father. (The latter was after a bad fall which resulted in a lengthy hospitalization, recovery, and then, in late December, a stroke.)
  • The death of two close friends, one sudden and shocking, the other anticipated but still painful.
  • A car crash bad enough to total one of our cars (the back wheel was ripped completely off) and leave the Rocket Scientist with lingering knee pain.
  • Me suffering first the flu (and yes, I had my shot — the flu only lasted two days) followed by bronchitis and pneumonia, which resulted in me running a fever for ten days and  being weak for weeks.
  • A leak in one of our bathrooms while we were away from home, resulting in half of our house being flooded during Christmas. (The Rocket Scientist, the boys, and the Resident Shrink worked New Year’s Eve and Day to dry out the house.  I was of little use, having caught a bad cold while I was back East.)
  • My being diagnosed with very severe anemia. (Fortunatley, that is on the way to being resolved: the infusion of several grams of iron has brought the important markers up to almost normal.)
  • College admissions drama.
  • My brother and his wife having the flu when we went to Florida, meaning we could only spend a little time with him and my nephew (a.k.a., the cutest kid in the world), and we couldn’t see my sister-in-law at all. (I hate to say this, given maternal pride and whatnot, but as cute as my kids when they were young (and they were mighty cute), my nephew may be cuter.)
  • The normal assorted crap that one faces in any given year.

Not that there were no high spots:

  • I worked almost all of the year.
  • The Red-Headed Menace graduated from high school, and won a scholarship for the wonderful job he had done turning his grades around after sophomore year.
  • I went to Spain and Portugal.
  • I went to Epcot.
  • The Little Drummer Boy, after a stint in North Georgia, moved to Brooklyn, found a job that pays well enough to support himself, and was able to see us while we were back East.
  • I was able to see my best friend from high school (hi Betsy!) whom I have not seen in probably fifteen years.  It was only for a couple of ours, but it was wonderful.
  • Railman being his usual wonderful self.

I was ready for 2014 to end.  Now I am more than ready for 2015 to improve.

Universe? You listening?

Posted in Family, My life and times | Tagged | Leave a comment

Poor Parenting.

This morning the family and I went to Starbucks.  I was not looking my best: the events of the past few days had caught up with me. My hair was not neat, and at the best of times I am nothing special to look at. I was wearing an older shirt (all my nice clothes were being laundered after our trip East so that I could turn around and go back for Jack’s funeral) and while I did not look disreputable I was certainly no fashion plate.  And, quite frankly, I didn’t care.

As I left, a casually but nicely dressed woman came to the door pushing a stroller. (I wished I had looked that put together when I had small children.) As I always do, I held the door open for her. I hold doors open for people, regardless of gender, and have taught my kids to do likewise.  I think it is simple good manners, and treating people like I would like to be treated.

She looked me over, compressed her lips, and without a word swept (there is really no other word for it) through the door, not even looking back. It has been a while since anyone treated me that rudely, especially when I was doing her a service.

After her trailed a small girl in a plaid coat.  She was about five and immaculately dressed.  Before she went through the door she turned, looked me straight in the eyes, and quietly and respectfully said “Thank you.” “You’re very welcome,” I responded.

Somewhere along the way, that child learned manners. I only hope that the woman was not her mother, and that whomever she is she does not manage to destroy that child’s behavior. My kids may not have been the pinnacle of appearances, but they have always been polite.*

*My favorite polite kid story: when Railfan was about twelve, we were entering Starbucks (Saturday morning coffee is a family tradition).  A couple who looked in their early twenties pulled up.  The young man got out of the car, slamming his door behind him, and sauntered into the building.  Railfan walked over, and opened the car door for his girlfriend, and then opened the door to the Starbucks and stepped back so she could enter before him.  She walked up to her boyfriend and said “There’s a kid who will know how to treat his girlfriend when he grows up.” The guy glared at Railfan, but, really, he had been shown up by a twelve-year-old.  (Railfan is also the person who stays behind to keep people at the back company (usually me, as I walk slower than everyone in the family), and asks others to wait up.)

Posted in Family, Kids in all their glory | Tagged | Leave a comment

R.I.P.

My father-in-law, Jack Glass, died on New Year’s Day.

We had known he did not all that much time left — he was suffering from pneumonia after being hospitalized for a stroke.  He had spent a lot of time in the hospital following a bad fall in February, and was still weak. Nonetheless, as with any death, when you get the call telling you, it is hard.  Losing a parent is horrible, as I well know.

I think all of us expected Jack to pull through: there had been so many times in the past that we thought he was done for, and he recovered. Jack was, if anything, a fighter.  I expect that when the Grim Reaper showed up, Jack kicked and hollered the entire way. The man did not give up.

My relationship with my father-in-law was, for a long time … complicated.  From the start, he and I disagreed about just about everything.  Over the years I think we developed mutual respect and affection, even though we still disagreed about everything. (Except football.)

I learned a great deal from my relationship with Jack:

I learned that it is still possible to love people with whom you disagree. Even when you disagree about important things.

I learned that it is important to recognize that people on “the other side” really aren’t — there is only one side, and all humanity is on it.  We ignore this at our peril.

I learned to recognize that what we share with each other is more important than what we don’t.

I learned I’m not always right about things. I learned I need to listen to people more. I learned that being judgmental is bad for me.

I learned that even if I disagree with someone, I can still enjoy being around them, especially watching football.

I learned that what people do is a better indicator of their character than what they say.

I am glad that I visited him on Christmas Day, and that the last words I said to him were “I love you.” (One of the things I learned from Mom’s death was that it is important to tell people that.) I wish I had told him how much he had taught me.

Jack Glass was a good man.  I will miss him.

Posted in Family | Tagged | 2 Comments