It’s too darn hot.

Today was the ninth day of a heat wave in Northern California, with temperatures well into the nineties everyday and the last three in triple digits at my house (and in the nineties well into the evening inside the house, as well). Given that, I think that this is an ideal time to go see Al Gore’s movie about global warming, “An Inconvenient Truth”: the theatre has air-conditioning.*

Part of me does want to ponder climate change and the ethics of the global warming debate, and how we are called to be stewards of God’s creation — what does that mean? Unfortunately, I think all the synapses in my brain have melted.

The San Francisco Bay peninsula may be the only place in the world where people wake up on a summer morning, look out at 7 a.m. to a world lit up by bright, clear golden sunshine, and say, “Oh, damn.” Conversely, gray, overcast skies mean hallelujah! that the clouds will burn off by lunchtime and the temperature will be lovely in the afternoon.

Yes, we’re spoiled, climactically. It never gets really cold in the winter, and most years it doesn’t get that hot except for a few weeks in late August and September. That’s one of the reasons people stay here in spite of the insane cost of living. There are others — such as being an hour from the beach and three from the mountains — but that’s a big part of it.

I grew up in Florida. I know I wouldn’t want to live in that climate anymore, as much as I love the state otherwise. They do, however, have one advantage over my current neck of the woods: almost all the buildings are air-conditioned. Here, I — and almost all of my friends — live in unair-conditioned houses, and it’s not uncommon for other places to lack climate control, either. Why air condition a house when most of the time you won’t need it?

So forgive us our whining. The heat wave will be over soon (even as I write this, fog is rolling into the bay, meaning it will be cooler tomorrow), and we’ll get back to our complaining about all the stuff we usually whine about — the high cost of real estate, and what’s going on in the tech industry, and why don’t the Giants get rid of Barry Bonds?, and….

*I really wish that joke were original with me, but it’s not; I saw it somewhere on Live Journal.

Posted in The Bay Area | 1 Comment

Blog review

For the most part, this is not a political blog. Not because I’m not interested, but because there are a lot of people who write those sort of blogs already, and I’m not sure what I would have to add to the discussion. I also read a couple of religious-oriented blogs, as well as some more personal blogs.

So what am I reading?

General political blogs:

Atrios: Atrios is one of the major leftie blogs, gets talked about in Newsweek articles, that sort of thing. The language can be coarse, and the comments are usually not worth bothering with, but it’s a good resource for links to other blogs.

Hullabaloo: Smaller than Atrios, Hullabaloo has better writing, especially the pieces written by Digby.

Sisyphus Shrugged: snarky commentary on current events. Good coverage of New York political scene.

Political blogs with a particular (although not exclusive) focus:

Respectful of Otters: My favorite political/policy blog. Rivka tends to write a lot about health issues and feminism, and she knows her stuff. She does her homework, is scrupulously fair, and is willing to call out idiocy regardless of where it comes from. She also as writes well as any blogger out there.

Orcinus: Dave Niewert’s blog focuses on following the extreme right wing, racism and immigration issues, as well as environmental issues occasionally. Niewert is a freelance journalist, and it shows: the writing is clear and persuasive. Fascinating, if frightening, reading.

Religion blogs:

Adventus
: Religion and politics. The blog can sometimes be very heavy going — it doesn’t hurt to understand formal theology — but other times is simply very profound and moving.

Slacktivist:
Religion and politics. (Those often go hand-in-hand, even for non-fundamentalist Christians.) Fred is a liberal, non-fundamentalist Evangelical. His series deconstructing the first of the “Left Behind” books by Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins gives both an amusing and informative look inside the mind of fundamentalists.

Of Course, I Could Be Wrong: by The Mad Monk. Anglicism, as seen from a liberal priest in England. Recently, there’s been a lot about the insanity in the Anglican Communion.

Indescribable:

Making Light
: Making Light is the popular blog by Teresa and Patrick Nielsen-Hayden, two science-fiction editors at Tor. While the posts are interesting, the real gold in Making Light is in the comments. Unlike many another blog, the comments are almost always intelligent, thoughtful, and use proper grammar. A recent post had comment threads that diverged into discussions of feminism, the morality of SUVs, and knitting. Teresa Nielsen-Hayden also invented the blogger convention of disemvoweling, whereby abusive or profane comments have their vowels removed, so they can still be read by those willing to puzzle them out, but are marked as being beyond the pale. (I have a great deal of trouble reading disemvoweled text, but I know from online interactions that I am in the minority.)

Personal blogs:

These are blogs I read because I know the people involved, although I think they are interesting enough to link to.

Ink Smudges: Cristopher Robinson, a priest in San Antonio, Texas, posts his sermons and other pieces on religion and faith. He doesn’t post all that often, but every post is a gem. His post on ashram cats should be required reading for all Episcopal church-goers.

Julie’s News From New York: I’ve already linked to this blog. The journey of a young woman through the wilds of seminary.

Going Jesus: Going Jesus is… something else. As is Sara, the blogger. I have had several people in conversation mention Going Jesus to me as something I needed to check out, not knowing that I knew Sara personally. I went to a wedding recently where the person who made the wedding cakes said she was inspired by the pictures of Sara’s wedding cake posted on the blog. Be sure and check out Sara’s amazing collection of religious kitsch — especially the “Cavalcade of Bad Nativities.” Oh, and for you knitters — Sara knits intarsia. She oftens posts pictures of her projects. I am soooo jealous.

So, those are the blogs I read — how about you?

Posted in Blogging | Tagged | 2 Comments

To the ends of the earth…

At the gift shop in Resolute Bay, Nunavit, you can buy a shirt that says “Resolute Bay is not the end of the world, but you can see it from here.” Not many people live in Resolute — 215, as of the 2001 Census. The second northernmost settlement in Canada (Grise Fiord is the northernmost), it is the debarkation point for scientific expeditions to the North Pole. The average yearly temperature is -16.4 F. , although right now it’s quite balmy, with temperatures in the low 40s. Resolute is a cold and isolated place.

It is civilization itself compared to Devon Island. Devon Island has no settlements on it. It is as uninhabited as…. Mars. Which is only one of the reasons that “Mars on Earth” — the Haughton-Mars Project — is located there. The more important ones have to do with the geological and biological attributes of the huge impact crater that’s more or less in the center of the island. Every year, scientists gather to study the crater and to use it to test equipment that hopefully one day will in some future iteration go to Mars.

My husband is up there now. This is his ninth consecutive year with HMP. He’s currently testing automated drills.

I’ve gotten used to it, now. Sort of. I no longer check the weather reports obsessively, I no longer check and recheck the project webcams to see if they’ve updated. (Especially since they haven’t been updated since the end of last field season.) I don’t let myself think the words “hypothermia” or “polar bears” or “ATV rollover” more than once every, oh, few hours.

Because when you love someone, you take them for who they are. In my case, that means saying “When do you need to leave?” a great deal. There is field work — Devon and rural Spain — and there are conferences — Japan and Valencia — and then there are just plain business trips — D.C. and Houston. During a particularly brutal spell last fall, he was away 68 days between July 1st and October 31st –including a six-week stint in Rio Tinto, Spain. That doesn’t include the traveling he did the rest of the year. Most years are not nearly so bad; he usually is away about a total of about 80 – 90 days a year.

He does what he does because it matters to him. He wants to do work that will advance exploration science, that may someday lead to his grandchildren standing on Mars. I applaud that far-sightedness: I appreciate the fact that he is not driven solely by thoughts of commercial gain. (If he was motivated by money, he sure wouldn’t be working for NASA. Private sector jobs for people of his qualifications pay much better.)

And my part in this is support, and making sure the kids are alright. I don’t say “Do you have to go to Devon?” I don’t say “But don’t you think six weeks is a long time to be away from home?” I will confess, however, that I sometimes say “Are you sure they really need you at XYZ boring business meeting at NASA Headquarters?”

Because he’s a scientist, an explorer. I can tether him, if I absolutely had too — but why? It’s just who he is. I have other friends who face the same issue, with far more stress than I. One friend has a husband who is a camerman who has done time in Iraq and who spends summer filming wildfires. Compared to that, worrying about a little bout of hypothermia is nothing.

It just goes with the territory of loving people whose first love is something larger than just another person. I’ve never been unclear on that. And to insist he stay home, cease to travel, explore, and pursue his goals would be to insist he change who he is. I love him, I don’t want him to let go of something that is so clearly a part of his psyche. So I offer encouragement and hold down the fort. I do this as cheerfully and with as much grace as I can muster.

But that doesn’t mean I have to like it.

Posted in Family | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

They shoot horses, don’t they?

I have been waiting for several days to write an obituary for Barbaro. He was diagnosed with laminitis last Tuesday. Laminitis is painful, incurable, and almost always ends in the horse being put down. The list of horses euthanized due to laminitis includes some of the best racehorses of the last fifty years, among them Triple Crown winner Affirmed and the horse many considered to have been the best to ever step on a racetrack, Secretariat.

I was going to write about how I love horses. I was going to write about the horse I loved most, and how she broke my heart. And I was going to relay what I had written elsewhere about Barbaro after his Derby win:

I saw the Derby. Unlike other years, I haven’t been following the pre-Derby races — and the papers haven’t been providing much coverage. Heading to the post, the commentators mentioned that it was a strong field with several unbeatens in it.

Barbaro won. By seven lengths, going away. After sitting just off the leaders who were running quite a fast pace.

There were a lot of horses — twenty –this year: the Derby is crowded. And some of those were presumably not really Derby caliber, and perhaps caused other, better, horses some problems.

But I don’t think any horse in that field could have caught Barbaro. Had this been the Belmont, the margin of victory would have been larger — he looked to be just warming up.

It’s too soon to anoint the horse a superstar, but damn, what a performance.

I like him even more because he’s *not* a pretty horse. His neck looks sort of scrawny, his head is not aristocratic but sort of chunky-looking. Then again, as people who’ve read the book or seen the movie know, Seabiscuit wasn’t a pretty horse, either.

Wow. I really hope he’s as good as he seemed on Saturday.

He’s not dead. But maybe he should be. Or should be soon.

His veterinarians and handlers say he’s in no pain, and they have a lot of experience dealing with horses, so I have to take them at their word. His owners say they are doing it out of love for the horse. I hope they are being honest with themselves and us.

Whatever they do, I hope they don’t breed him.

In three years running, the top three-year-old has broken down and ended his racing career. Horses are running fewer races before being retired to stud. Horses are being bred to be Roman candles: burst onto the scene, blaze brightly, and retire while young. They are bred for speed, not stamina, and are trained accordingly.

When a nationally known trainer like Nick Zito says “We’ve debilitated the breed,” you need to pay attention. He knows — and, what’s more, he has a vested interest in the status quo.

Veterinary medicine can save horses that would not have been saved even a relatively few years ago. Increasing acceptance of use of drugs such as Lasix and bute help horses race when maybe they shouldn’t. If a horse runs well, and then breaks down, nothing is to keep him (or her) out of the breeding shed.

The bloodstock advisor at Three Chimneys Farm, where Barbaro’s sire Dynaformer stands at stud, claims that there is nothing wrong with the colt’s soundness, that he was just the victim of bad luck. Perhaps. But I do know this: he was running on an open track, and he didn’t run into another horse, or the rail, he simply took a “misstep.” When he damaged his leg, he didn’t pull a ligament, he shattered his hind leg, requiring a titanium plate and over twenty screws to fix. That may be bad luck; it may be bad genes. Do we want to take a chance?

As humans, we have an ethical responsiblity to breed for soundness in our domesticated animals, since we have usurped the role natural selection plays in determining the gene pool. That we have often sacrificed complete soundness to gain other characteristics in show dogs is bad enough. To breed horses for speed alone, without regard for stamina, increases the likelihood of more breakdowns. More pain. More death.

So save the horse, if you can. He’s a real charmer by all accounts. (His veterinarian reports that he has a positive attitude. How can you tell?) But don’t let him pass down his genes.

We need to be responsible as a species to the species under our care.

Posted in Sports | Leave a comment

Remember those questions I asked God a couple of weeks back? My friend Julie, the New York seminarian, answers some of them.

Posted in God faith and theology | Tagged | 1 Comment

S-C-H-I….

At one point in The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee, Jesus appears to one of the contestants, a hyperachieving young woman named Marcy Park.

“Jesus, will you be disappointed in me if I lose?”

“No, my child, I won’t be disappointed if you lose. I also won’t be disappointed if you win. Mainly, though, this is not the sort of thing I care about.

I wonder what Jesus must think of us Episcopalians these days. We are taking time out from our mission to be a blessing to other people to engage in a nasty internecine war. It’s been brewing a while – the confirmation of Gene Robinson three years ago may have been a flashpoint, and the election of Katherine Jeffords-Schori as Presiding Bishop poured fuel on the fire, but the powder was spread around good and thick on the ground years ago. In 2000, for example, several bishops were consecrated by the Archbishops of Rwanda and Southeast Asia and sent to America, intended to be “missionary bishops.”

I am not claiming the moral high ground — well, maybe I am. I don’t know. I do know that I am sad and angry and tired of all this nonsense. And things are going to get much worse.

We’re beyond the pale, the ECUSA, for daring to confirm a gay bishop? But Nigeria, where the Standing Committee of the Archdiocese called for gays and lesbians to not only be excluded from the life of the church but thrown in jail for five years, is not?

Supposedly our position is “non-Scriptural.” I think that’s wrong (and in any case when did Anglicans become Biblical literalists?), but Archbishop Peter Akinola’s, with his view of homosexuals as “beasts,” is more “non-Scriptural” by a damn sight. We are faulted for going against the 1998 Lambeth Report (and 2004 Windor Report) because we (in a divided vote) confirmed the election of a gay bishop — a bishop who had been duly and properly selected by his diocese — and because we refused to swear never to do it again, since “homosexual practice [is] incompatible with Scripture.” Fine. Those reports also say

We commit ourselves to listen to the experience of homosexual persons and we wish to assure them that they are loved by God and that all baptised, believing and faithful persons, regardless of sexual orientation, are full members of the Body of Christ; while rejecting homosexual practice as incompatible with Scripture, calls on all our people to minister pastorally and sensitively to all irrespective of sexual orientation and to condemn irrational fear of homosexuals. . .

Throwing people in jail for five years is “minister[ing] to them pastorally and sensitively.” Good to know.

And then there is the matter of gender. The diocese of Fort Worth asked for alternative oversight within forty-eight hours of the election of Jeffords-Schori. This was not a thoughtful, Spirit-driven response to the events at Convention. How could it have been? Dioceses do not move that fast. This had to have been planned well in advance. So much for letting the Spirit speak — much better to determine what messages are acceptable, before we are faced with them.

The traditionalists accuse us of lack of discipline. And I say, what discipline does it take to adhere to tradition in the face of new knowledge and understanding? Is that discipline or rigidity? And is working for change based on that understanding kowtowing to popular culture, or is it showing strength to fight for what God speaks to us, rather than falling back on what has always been done? Spiritual discernment is a discipline, too: and by its nature discernment must not presupppose the answer being discerned.

It takes discipline to undertake actions in which there is a strong possibility of being treated with scorn, derision or hatred. At the 2000 General Convention, a delegate from Dallas took it upon himself to sprinkle salt for exorcism under the tables of delegations with openly gay delegates. A gay priest said “This happens to us all the time. It is good that it is out in the open.” It takes courage, and yes, discipline, to keep trying to affect change in such situations.

Following General Convention, Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury suggested a two-tiered Communion: provinces who agreed to abide by “Scriptural principals” (to be defined, of course, by the most traditionalist elements in the Communion) would be full members. Others — i.e., the ECUSA, and perhaps the Canadian and New Zealand churches — would be “associates” who would not affect the positions of the Anglican Communion: you can hang around and pretend to be part of the club, but we’re not going to listen to you.

Schism. From Latin, meaning a formal division or separation from or between a religious body. As in “Rowan Williams has effectively proposed a schism between the Episcopal Church in America and the rest of the Anglican Communion.” S-C-H-I-S-M. Schism.

But then I keep coming back to my original question: does any of this matter? The real work of the Lord goes on in the pews, in the streets, between people. Regardless of what happens to the ECUSA’s position in the Anglican Communion, we will still do the Lord’s work in the world to the best of our understanding and ability.

Like Marcy Park, it sure would be nice to have Jesus appear and tell us what to do. Unlike Marcy Park, I don’t expect that to happen — we’re going to have to pray and listen to discern where to go next.

Posted in God faith and theology | 4 Comments

It was a dark and stormy night….

In November 2003, during National Novel Writing Month (NaNoWriMo), I wrote a novel.

A bad novel.

A very, very bad novel.

A key part of the plot was that the protagonist (a woman based on me, except she looked nothing like me, being slim and with gray eyes, which is about as far away from me as you can get) spent a lot of time in bars playing trivia. In fact, the name of this putative novel was Pursuit (as in “Trivial…”). The problem was, I had written this without actually having spent much time (any, actually) playing trivia in bars.

That’s changed. I’ve now done some research — which involved the arduous task of sitting around drinking Sam Adams and trying to figure out which fourteenth century theologian rejected the doctrine of transubstantiation* — and I have a better sense of the social dynamics involved. I need to engage in more research, of course; next Saturday I’ll be at Spoons Bar & Restaurant in Sunnyvale, California doing just that.

I got to wondering if maybe, now that I actually know something of what I am writing about, I could tighten up the flabby sections and the novel might be halfway decent. So last night I hunted it down from the bowels of the old computer (the one the kids use, not my laptop) and checked it out. Was there any hope?

Uh, no.

It was not as bad as I remembered. It was worse.

There is, as the proverb goes, always a silver lining: the opening sentence (of which I remember being particularly proud at the time) is so bad I’m going to enter it in the next Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest.

I’ll let you know how I do.


*John Wycliffe. That’s okay, I guessed Martin Luther, too.

Posted in Who I am | Tagged | 3 Comments

Andrea Yates and me.

The retrial of Andrea Yates for the murder of her children began this week. When I see pictures of her in the courtroom, the thought flashes across my mind, unbidden, that could have been me.

Postpartum depression is a condition which affects about 10-15% of new mothers, and which, thanks to women such as Brooke Shields, is finally getting some recognition in contexts outside criminal trials. Postpartum psychosis is a much more serious and uncommon condition, affecting one to two new mothers per one thousand births.

In 1990, in California, there were approximately 600 thousand babies born. Which means appromixately six hundred to a thousand new mothers would have developed PPP.

I was one of them.

The symptoms of PPP include hallucinations (had those — and it’s really interesting how they don’t seem at all like hallucinations at the time), delusional thoughts (does the thought that the baby is actively trying to harm me count?) and feelings (unrelieved guilt is not a rational emotion, even for a new mother), and suicidal or homicidal thoughts (check and, sadly, check). The scary thing is that women who have never been mentally ill can be affected, and that a woman with PPP can go from lucid to psychotic in a matter of hours. Few women with PPP actually kill either themselves or their baby, but the risk is still there, and in any case the psychosis is damaging enough even without loss of life.

I would not have ended up like Andrea Yates: I did not have five kids, and a history of schizophrenia. And I was lucky, I had a husband who listened and got me help when I said I was going to kill myself or the baby. Andrea Yates, on the other hand, had a husband who failed to properly oversee her with her children even though she had tried to kill herself twice following the birth of her fourth child, and had been in a psychiatric facility just a month before. And a doctor who, one week before the murders, reduced her psych meds.

It’s scary to admit to having been psychotic. While the social stigma against depression is easing, the social stigma against psychosis is not. The fact that the DSM-IV does not recognize postpartum psychosis as a separate category from other types of psychosis does not make it easier to talk about PPP. But speaking out is the first step to overcoming shame.

There are definite risk factors for PPP: a personal or family history of bipolar disorder, psychosis, schizophrenia, or PPP. (About that last one, I should note that while articles I’ve read indicate that women who suffered from PPP are at risk for it with subsequent pregnancies, it’s not a given: I had two more children without a reoccurence of the psychosis. I took the steps I outline below with subsequent pregnancies, and I firmly believe that’s the reason I didn’t become psychotic. However, it’s a definite risk factor.)

So what should women at risk and their partners do? (Note that these are my suggestions, based on common sense, and having walked the road myself, with some help from experts.)

Plan ahead:

Talk to your obstetrician specifically about any personal and family history of mental illness, and about what to look for and what to do if you develop problems. Don’t let it simply be an item that gets checked off when they take your medical history.

Plan to have as much help on hand after your baby is born. Investigate all sources of support — friends, neighbors, family, even in some cases employers. (Google wins my award for most family-friendly worker benefit: they allow new parents to expense up to $500 worth of take-out meals for four weeks after a new baby is born.) This is important for all new parents, really.

Find a lactation consultant. (Yes, I do believe in breastfeeding. Really.) Look for a consultant who has worked with women who have suffered from PPD or PPP. (My first LC had not, the ones I had with my second child had.) In any case, find a lactation consultant who will be supportive of whatever decisions you need to make, even if that means reducing or ending nursing. It is easier to talk to consultants when you are not awash in postpartum hormones.

After the birth:

As all the advice books tell all new mothers, sleep as much as possible. Rest when the baby naps. If you need several hours of uninterrupted sleep (say, four), make sure that you get it — either by pumping and storing breastmilk or using formula and supplementing if that’s what it takes. Have the father do as much as possible. This is true even as the baby gets older and you are physically more recovered from delivery: PPP can last for months.

Talk to people about what you are feeling. You will not be able to tell always when you are becoming depressed or even psychotic, and other people are more likely to pick up on it. Trust me, when they are happening, hallucinations seem absolutely real.

Don’t isolate. You need to sleep, but when you are awake and other people are around, interact with them.

Be prepared to go on psychiatric drugs if you need them. It is not a sign of weakness, or that you are a failure as a mother. If anything, it is a sign that you care enough about your child to be responsible and functional. Being psychotic will do far more damage to your relationship with your child than, say, having to give up breastfeeding in order to take anti-psychotics.

For partners of new mothers: listen to what she is saying. If she is exhibiting bizarre and irrational behavior, or seems to be disorganized or delusional, call her obstetrician right away. That’s what the experts say. I would go a bit farther: trust your intuition. Yes, new mothers are subject to mood swings, but only to some extent, and if she seems depressed and crying for days on end (or, conversely, irrationally elated, or swings rapidly between the two) she needs help. It’s not as serious as PPP, but PPD is really bad for everyone, too, so signs of significant depression need to be treated as well. Also, don’t dismiss as hyperbole statements that seem like mere overemotion: if your partner says, “the baby won’t stop crying,” when you know that the baby cries some but not all the time, don’t assume that she’s simply exaggerating. She could be hallucinating, and hearing the baby cry all the time, even when he’s not.* (I have that t-shirt.)

This is not meant to scare anyone: PPP is a relatively rare condition. But many of the steps above also apply to women at risk for/suffering from PPD, which affects 10-15% of new mothers. If they help just one or two women, it will be worth it.

Because it’s a black road to walk down, even if it does not end in the graveyard and the courtroom, as it did for Andrea Yates and her children.

*PPP is absolute hell for partners, as well as mothers; my husband could tell you that. Both of us wish we had known this information going into my first pregnancy (I have a family history of mental illness, so I was at risk) because we would have known what to do. As it was he did the best he could in dealing with a wife who was, it turned out, temporarily certifiably insane. Poor guy.

Posted in My life and times, Who I am | 3 Comments

PSA

My very favorite political and public affairs blog, Respectful of Otters, is back online after a nine-months absence. Rivka is scrupulously fair, willing to call out idiocy in any direction when she sees it, and she does her homework. She also writes well, which in the world of political blogging is nothing to sneeze at.

Check her out.

Posted in nothing special | Leave a comment

A letter to the Almighty.

Dear God,

I’m really furious.

I’ve been working on this acceptance business. Really, I have been. I have let go of needing to know why N. died even though she just turned forty. Of why C. has to raise two young daughters alone. I recognize that I cannot know how You are at work in this.

And I recognize that my trip to the emergency room — asthma and a pulled pectoral muscle (i.e, chest pain and shortness of breath, a lot like cardiac symptoms) — was a wake-up call that I need to be more careful about how I take care of my body. I can see a lesson here, and I am working at accepting that, too.

But the car? The three-year-old van going into complete and total transmission failure at midnight on I-5 in the Central Valley a hundred miles from nowhere, when we were so desperately rushing home so my husband could fly to be with his brother? What on Your green earth was that all about?

Does every step of this have to be a misery? Can’t You cut me a little slack? I am working so hard.

My friend says that’s not how You work. It’s not? How do You work then? Are You some sort of detached God, who sits and grieves the human condition but does not one damn thing about it, for all Your vaunted omnipotence? Enquiring minds want to know here. Do You even exist? Is the sound of sheer silence You, or simply silence?

Forty. Dammit, God. She was forty.

Is it true then? Is life random and unfair? Is it pandemonium?

That smug young preacher at C.’s church last week in his sermon said that “blessed means happy– not just happy but ‘turbo-happy’.” Oh, yeah? What does that make me? Or C.? Because I can assure You that we are not happy. He’s grieving, and I’m mad. Because bad things have happened to us, is that evidence that You’ve turned your back on us? Screw that.

Your Son said “Blessed are they who mourn, for they shall be comforted.” I’m taking that for a promise; C. needs comforting. (I notice that nowhere in the Beatitudes does it say “blessed are the seriously pissed off.”)

I’m still here. I’m still mad.

Pat.

Posted in God faith and theology, Personal Relationships | 1 Comment

Requiem.

N. died today.

We were expecting it, of course. Still, getting a phone call telling you someone you love has died hurts, no matter how much it was expected. Even the San Diego Wild Animal Park — an otherwise wonderful place — can’t help with that. I got the call when we wandering around near the lions and elephants, on our way to go see the bird show. I sat through the bird show and stared down the Eurasian Eagle Owl that flew right at me without so much as flinching.

I feel I should write something, but I am tired and discouraged, and, after a Long Island Iced Tea and a Hurricane downstairs at the bar here, inebriated. At the bar, they were playing a national trivia game. One of these games where you are hooked in via computer with players all over the country. N. and my brother-in-law would play this, sometimes, and they would call me to get help with some of the answers. I played my first several games of bar trivia tonight, as much to take my mind off of things as anything, but I think N. would have been amused. (Hey, N., I won three games at the bar! and on one of the games I ranked thirteenth nationally!)

Instead, until I can write something better, here is what I wrote about her last December.

Rest in peace, dear N.

Posted in My life and times | 2 Comments

For Whom the Bell Tolls.

I am two thousand miles from my home, in the dining room of my mother-in-law. I have come here to see my husband’s sister-in-law, who is in the last stages of brain cancer.

I have never been around dying people before. My sister-in-law cannot talk, but so far she has been awake and responsive to people around her. She is surrounded by her family, my brother-in-law and nieces, and her parents and sisters. She is cared for by the people who love her most.

I was afraid of coming here. I was afraid she would be in pain. I was afraid for myself that I would find the sadness overwhelming, that being faced with the loss of this wonderful woman who has been my friend for seventeen years and who has brought such joy to my husband’s family would cause me to cry all the time. She is too young, her leaving this earth too tragic.

Instead, even though it is unsettling, I also find being around her to be strangely comforting. She is dying — so must we all. I will miss her, but I am no longer afraid for her. I am afraid for my brother-in-law, some, but only because we live in uncertain times and being a single parent is very hard for anyone.

It is true that how we think of people tends to be colored by who they were when we first met them. Part of me has always thought of C. as the boy who kept getting into scrapes his first year in college, as the mischievous and charming youngest child. Even after his children were born, part of me just sort of marvelled at the thought of him as a father (even though his wife as a mother seemed perfectly natural).

He is a man of integrity and great strength. He is allowing his wife to leave this earth with dignity and love. He is maintaining normality and calmness for his children, yet not pretending that everything is okay. Today he said to me, “People die. It’s part of life. I want them [his kids] to understand that.” There is not a touch of maudlinness in any of the people surrounding my sister-in-law, and he has been careful to see that that is the case.

When they were married, for various reasons, people questioned how they could end up together. They seemed to be very different people. But they loved each other very much, and now, I think it’s apparent how right they have been for each other all along.

So, there is the waiting. Tomorrow is N.’s birthday, and there will be a small celebration. I bought a card and some chocolates. Buying the birthday card brought me to tears for the first time since I arrived: how do you buy a card for someone when all of the cards speak of a future that will never be?

I will leave on Sunday to fly home, having said goodbye. I am very glad that I am here.

Posted in My life and times, Personal Relationships | 3 Comments

Why I am not a lactivist.

I was going to do everything “properly” with my first baby. Natural birth, no epidural, no C-section. And I was going to nurse my baby from the start; formula was evil. It’s amazing how dogmatic you can get when you really don’t know much about life.

From the start, things were not as I had so carefully planned them. I was sick all nine months of my pregnancy, including one hospitalization and several E.R. trips to remedy severe dehydration. Then the baby was late — very late — and we needed to induce labor.

Labor lasted thirty hours. It was hell. I kept up my resolution to not use drugs until the twenty-sixth hour when, physically exhausted and discouraged, I begged for an epidural. Several hours later, my son was born.

As many babies do, he needed to be fed frequently. I was still exhausted from labor, and being woken up every two hours to feed simply deepened that exhaustion. I vaguely remember begging my obstetrician not to send me home after 24 hours. He, of course, had no choice: insurance being what it was, I would have had to pay for the hospital bed an additional day (even if the hospital would have let me stay, which was unclear), money which I just didn’t have.

I went home to a household filled with grandparents just in time for the Thanksgiving holiday. Given that my mother-in-law was there, I was determined not to let her do all the work. (She had rearranged my living room furniture while I was in labor. I had something to prove, or thought I did.) And the baby still needed to be fed every two hours.

My husband called my sister and a local La Leche League consultant. No, it was important that we never supplement. I was ready to throw in the towel, but he held firm. (In his defense, he didn’t know anything more about this than I did.) My exhaustion deepened; I began to feel as though I was completely disconnected from the world.

I have suffered from depression a lot in my life, but nothing was like the pit I descended into then. It was as though the ground had dropped beneath my feet leaving me in utter blackness. I began to lose contact with my surroundings. My sleep deprivation was becoming severe. And the baby needed to be fed every two hours.

And he started to cry all the time. Nothing would soothe him. I would hold him, and he would be okay, but soon he would be crying again. I could not escape the crying. I started being unable to sleep between feedings, because the baby was crying all the time.

I still remember the day I went to the store to get a few items. I was on the way back when the baby started crying again. I felt such despair, the baby was crying again — would it never stop? Was there nothing I could do?

The baby was not in the car with me, but at home with my mother.

It says something about my mental state that it was not until several months later that I recognized the fact that I had been hallucinating. And probably not for the first time: about a year ago, my husband and I were talking about when my son was a newborn. “He cried all the time,” I said. My husband gave me a strange look,” No, he didn’t, no more than the other two. He didn’t get colicky until he was several months old.”

I was in freefall. Things came to a head a week later, when my husband had to go out of town for a business trip, leaving me and the baby alone in the house (my mother had gone back to Florida a day or so before). I looked at him calmly and said “If you leave, one or the other of us won’t be here when you get back.” What I did not tell him — or anyone — until years later was that I had already known I was going to kill myself. I thought there was a good chance I was going to kill the baby, too, and whatever spark of compassion I had in my soul (not fear of damnation — I was already damned) made me feel that this was grossly unfair to the baby. It wasn’t the baby’s fault I was its mother, he shouldn’t have to die for that.

He got angry, but called my obstetrician, who had me hospitalized. The first things the doctor did? Take the baby from my care, have my husband feed the baby formula, and have me sleep for twenty-four hours. When I woke up, I felt far more sane than I had in the previous two weeks.

There was still a lot to be done — my relationship with my son had been damaged by my psychosis, and that needed to be repaired. You may notice above that I refer to “the baby” and even “it”; that was how I thought of him. The social worker made me start calling him by name, and seeing him as my child rather than this alien being. When I think of those first days, I can’t help but think of him as being born during my second hospitalization — that was when I got to know him and see him as my child.

After that, we supplemented wherever it was necessary to make sure that I had at least four to six hours of uninterrupted sleep. And we did this with the second and third children as well. Prompt treatment of post-partum depression helped insure that I didn’t end up psychotic again.

So whenever I hear lactation fascists go on about how horrible bottles are, and how awful mothers are who feed their babies formula, I just want to tell them to go straight to hell. Hopefully, a hell as deep and black as the one I experienced when I came frighteningly close to committing suicide and murder.

Posted in My life and times, Who I am | 11 Comments

Sigh. You would think that people would have better things to do with their time.

I am referring to the flap over at Live Journal about the use of breastfeeding pictures as default icons. I was thinking it was an LJ thing, and once the initial flurry had passed, I could safely ignore it, until Patrick Neilsen Hayden at Making Light, one of the most interesting blogs around, posted “LJ’s attack on women and mothers.”

I am both. I have been a nursing mother, and I know some of the pitfalls and stresses caused by trying to nurse in public. I know how frustrating it is to have to deal with people who think that the sight of a baby being breastfed is WRONG! I know what it’s like to have to pump milk in a bathroom stall because there was no appropriate place to do so.

And I say: If the fact that you cannot use a picture of your nursing baby as your default icon on your LJ creates a crisis for you, then you need to get a life.

People are still allowed to use pictures of themselves as icons other than default icons. People are still allowed to post pictures of themselves nursing their babies. (People use actually racy /pornographic images on some of their non-default icons.) No one is saying they can’t.

Providers of services on the Internet are coming under increasing scrutiny. Listening to television news, you would think that MySpace (the site most singled out for attention by the fearmongers in the media and elsewhere) is nothing more than a den of pedophiles and pornographers waiting to seduce and corrupt the Youth of America. Live Journal operates in an area that is threatened with government regulation. They are walking a fine line between respecting the free speech of their users and running afoul of the more conservative elements out there who could make life difficult for them and by extension their users.

It has, however, been treated as a “LJ is against nursing mothers!” issue. It has also given some of the more radical — and nasty — pro-breastfeeding people an opportunity to make mothers who cannot breastfeed feel like shit. According to the nursing totalitarians, anyone who does not breastfeed their baby is an unfit mother, quite ignoring the fact that there are many caring, thoughtful mothers who cannot breastfeed. (If you notice in the article quoted, nursing is the only proper way to feed a baby, and women who don’t are poor, or uneducated. Funny, all the women I know who’ve struggled with this have been bright, well-educated, and simply unable to nurse, and their babies have done fine.)[Edit: At the suggestion of commenters, the moderators redacted out the more inflammatory portions of the quoted article as being irrelevant to the discussion of LJ’s policies.]

There are real issues facing nursing mothers. Having a place to either pump milk or nurse your baby while at work being a big one. Actually being prevented from nursing in public is another. Support for low-income mothers is another. Getting the information out about breastfeeding in a calm non-judgmental way is important.

Not being able to post a 100 pixel square picture of a woman nursing a baby as a default icon at LJ is not.

*For those lucky enough to not be familiar with what’s going on, LJ asked a user to remove a breastfeeding woman icon as their default icon, and the user publicized this, and it became a “LJ is stifling free speech!” and “LJ is against nursing mothers!” sort of thing.

Posted in Feminism | Tagged | Leave a comment

Who are we?

Thinking back about the last post, about how a society/culture/tribe identifies with its art, I began to consider what this meant for America.

Most of our cultural landmarks have not been in the visual arts, for one thing. When I think of American contributions to world culture, I think musically: jazz, blues, gospel, rock, Broadway show tunes. Then there are the cultural identifiers which perhaps the rest of the world might not celebrate: baseball, rodeo, the more fanciful forms of American roadside architecture, Las Vegas.

There is a lot of great American art: the paintings of Edward Hopper, Andrew Wyeth, Homer Winslow. The photographs of Dorothea Lange and Ansel Adams. The architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright. All to name just a tiny fraction of America’s visual cultural riches. But what is America’s Mona Lisa*? Our Parthenon?

There are a few paintings, several sculptures, a feat of engineering, and a temple that I think fit the bill.

The paintings would be Gilbert Stuart’s portrait of George Washington (which we have because Dolley Madison recognized iconic art when she saw it and saved it from the marauding British),
Emanuel Gottlieb Leutze’s Washington Crossing the Delaware, and perhaps, Grant Wood’s American Gothic.**

The sculpture would be Mount Rushmore, the Gateway Arch (is it sculpture? is it architecture?), and most importantly, the Statue of Liberty. How lovely that, in a nation of immigrants, the most significant piece of public art in the country should herself be an immigrant.

The engineering feat? That would be the Golden Gate Bridge, which holds a place in American imagination far beyond its utility as a means of getting from the City by the Bay to Sausalito. (Okay, I’m a Northern Californian. I’m biased.)

And the temple would be the Lincoln Memorial.***

What am I missing? What other pieces of visual art are quintessentially American?

* In 1911, Vincent Perugia stole the Mona Lisa from the Louvre and brought it back with him to Florence. In France the crime was seen as a national calamity; in Italy, the thief was viewed as a popular hero.

** No, I’m not entirely serious with that last one.

***I’m not including the White House or Capitol: they are primarily interesting for political reasons.

Posted in Art, Culture (popular and otherwise) | Leave a comment